[Scons-users] Grouped dependency

[William Blevins]

Yeah, that is essentially what Dirke was proposing. He was suggesting to do
it as a (Pseudo)Builder to make it cleaner.

V/R,
William

On Thu, Apr 28, 2016 at 7:56 PM, Tom Tanner <trtanner at btinternet.com> wrote:

> On 26/4/16 14:27, William Blevins wrote:
>
>> Dirk,
>>
>> You could do that as long as only the first source made it to the
>> commandline, though its ugly.
>>
>> You certainly cannot do Depends(A, B), Depends(A, C), Depends(B, A),
>> Depends(B, C), Depends(C, A), Depends(C, B).
>>
>> V/R,
>> William
>>
>> But couldn't you do
>
> Depends('a.o', 'b.cpp', 'c.cpp')
> Depends('b.o', 'a.cpp', 'c.cpp')
> Depends('c.o', 'a.cpp', 'b.cpp')
>
> ?
>
> _______________________________________________
> Scons-users mailing list
> Scons-users at scons.org
> https://pairlist4.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-users
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://pairlist4.pair.net/pipermail/scons-users/attachments/20160428/b1255c67/attachment.html>