[Scons-users] smartlink and reiterating compile flags on the link step

[Russel Winder]

On Tue, 2015-11-03 at 09:18 -0800, Bill Deegan wrote:
> smartlink determines what linker to use to link an executable based
> on the
> contents.
> For example if the contents is plain C vs C++ you many need a
> different
> linker/flags/etc.
> 

And it's complexity is that it has to deal with C, C++, Fortran and D.
Sadly it is still not as successful as it should be. There are no
failing tests, but that is because the tests that would fail are not in
the test suite!

-- 
Russel.
=============================================================================
Dr Russel Winder      t: +44 20 7585 2200   voip: sip:russel.winder at ekiga.net
41 Buckmaster Road    m: +44 7770 465 077   xmpp: russel at winder.org.uk
London SW11 1EN, UK   w: www.russel.org.uk  skype: russel_winder

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 181 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <https://pairlist4.pair.net/pipermail/scons-users/attachments/20151104/11ed2adc/attachment.pgp>