[Scons-users] Chaining generated sources.

William Blevins wblevins001 at gmail.com
Fri May 23 19:43:23 EDT 2014


A while ago, there was a long discussion about Java and derived sources.
 At some point I attached a patch for an example test case and never got
any feedback.  Is there something else that I need to do?

V/R,
William


On Wed, Apr 2, 2014 at 7:49 PM, William Blevins <wblevins001 at gmail.com>wrote:

> Did the patch make sense?
>
> I haven't heard anything back.
>
> V/R,
> William
>
>
> On Sun, Mar 2, 2014 at 3:49 PM, William Blevins <wblevins001 at gmail.com>wrote:
>
>> Bill,
>>
>> I made a patch which shows test case proof of concept.
>>
>> The generalized test case fails as I expected, but I would like to make a
>> stronger test assumption than "test.up_to_date()".  I am a little uncertain
>> on how to explicitly test against the "nodes" created by env.Java through
>> the TestSCons instance.
>>
>> I may be able to write the node information to a file inside the
>> SConstruct and check the expected with "test.must_contain_exactly_lines",
>> but this seems round about.  Any thoughts?
>>
>> V/R,
>> William
>>
>>
>> On Sat, Mar 1, 2014 at 12:36 AM, Bill Deegan <bill at baddogconsulting.com>wrote:
>>
>>> William,
>>>
>>> *bump* is a sign of impatience. Nobody working on scons is getting paid
>>> to do so.
>>> You may also notice that often during the week, there's less response
>>> from some members of the project, and more on the weekend. Many people do
>>> this on their free time.
>>>
>>> Yes I thought it was clear that Dirk was asking for whatever code you
>>> could provide.
>>>
>>> So please do.
>>>
>>> -Bill
>>>
>>>
>>> On Fri, Feb 28, 2014 at 3:18 PM, William Blevins <wblevins001 at gmail.com>wrote:
>>>
>>>> Bill,
>>>>
>>>> Sorry, I assumed that the internet meme was established by now.  My
>>>> test case response had an implicit question that got missed.
>>>>
>>>> "If you need help creating this test case then, I could try to create
>>>> a patch sometime this week with a link to documentation for contributing to
>>>> SCons."
>>>>
>>>> Since there wasn't a response, I didn't know whether I had volunteered
>>>> myself to create the patch or not.  Redoing work is a waste.
>>>>
>>>> V/R,
>>>> William
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, Feb 28, 2014 at 1:31 AM, Bill Deegan <bill at baddogconsulting.com
>>>> > wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> William,
>>>>>
>>>>> *bump* is not encouraged.
>>>>> -1
>>>>>
>>>>> -Bill
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Thu, Feb 27, 2014 at 5:07 PM, William Blevins <
>>>>> wblevins001 at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> * bump *
>>>>>>
>>>>>> V/R,
>>>>>> William
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 7:33 PM, William Blevins <
>>>>>> wblevins001 at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The builder implementation is irrelevant to the test case, so I
>>>>>>> recommend generalizing.  The easiest way to do this would be:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> 1) Make a <name>.java file that has one or more of the properties
>>>>>>> that causes this problem:
>>>>>>>     1) The java file creates more than one class file when compiled.
>>>>>>>     2) The java class package is not equal to the root package.
>>>>>>> 2) Write an SConscript that essentially does
>>>>>>>     # Psuedo code as follows
>>>>>>>     Line 1: env = Environment()
>>>>>>>     Line 2: env.Command( "<test_case_input_file>",
>>>>>>> "<source_directory>/<package_info>/<test_case_file_name>", Copy("$TARGET",
>>>>>>> "$SOURCE") )
>>>>>>>     Line 3: env.Java( targets = <build_directory>, sources =
>>>>>>> <source_directory> )
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> This test case provides the following benefits:
>>>>>>> 1) It is simple and easy to understand.
>>>>>>>     Line 1: environment is setup for the example
>>>>>>>     Line 2: source "<test_case_input_file>" creates target
>>>>>>> "<source_directory>/<package_info>/<test_case_file_name>" named DERIVED.
>>>>>>>     Line 3: DERIVED becomes a derived source for the Java builder.
>>>>>>> 2) This keeps the context local to SCons and removes any external
>>>>>>> dependencies: so all code generators are equal~!
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Now you just need to validate the produced dependency tree.  Please
>>>>>>> see the original email for dependency tree examples.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> V/R,
>>>>>>> William
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> If you need help creating this test case then, I could try to create
>>>>>>> a patch sometime this week with a link to documentation for contributing to
>>>>>>> SCons.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Sat, Feb 22, 2014 at 7:29 PM, Dirk Bächle <tshortik at gmx.de>wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 22.02.2014 22:26, William Blevins wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Unfortunately, I cannot post the code without going through a lot
>>>>>>>>> of hoops.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Okay, I understand...but could you post your version of the Protoc
>>>>>>>> Builder? The original snippet from the Wiki, as well as the latest revision
>>>>>>>> from the Bitbucket repository, both don't support Java.
>>>>>>>> So having your current Builder available would really help for
>>>>>>>> setting up simple test examples and such.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Thanks a lot in advance.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Dirk
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>> Scons-users mailing list
>>>>>>>> Scons-users at scons.org
>>>>>>>> http://four.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-users
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> Scons-users mailing list
>>>>>> Scons-users at scons.org
>>>>>> http://four.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-users
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Scons-users mailing list
>>>>> Scons-users at scons.org
>>>>> http://four.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-users
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Scons-users mailing list
>>>> Scons-users at scons.org
>>>> http://four.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-users
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Scons-users mailing list
>>> Scons-users at scons.org
>>> http://four.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-users
>>>
>>>
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://four.pairlist.net/pipermail/scons-users/attachments/20140523/da52de95/attachment.html>


More information about the Scons-users mailing list