[Scons-users] Questions about tool selection

Andrew C. Morrow andrew.c.morrow at gmail.com
Thu Jun 13 08:57:44 EDT 2013


Hi Bill -

Embedding SCons has been considered a few times. There are definite
pros, and some definite cons. So far we have decided against doing so,
but perhaps we should consider it again.

Thanks,
Andrew


On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 8:11 PM, Bill Deegan <bill at baddogconsulting.com> wrote:

> Andrew,

>

> You could include scons-local in your distro, and then customize as you

> please.

> Submitting pull request for changes which would be of value to the general

> public

>

> -Bill

>

>

> On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 4:24 PM, Andrew C. Morrow

> <andrew.c.morrow at gmail.com> wrote:

>>

>> On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 5:42 PM, Bill Deegan <bill at baddogconsulting.com>

>> wrote:

>> > Andrew,

>> >

>> > When you say "whatever I do to evict sunlink needs to be backported to

>> > at

>> > least one stable release.", do you mean a release of your software, or

>> > an

>> > older version of SCons?

>>

>> Ah, sorry, yes that was ambiguous. I meant backported to an earlier

>> stable release of my software.

>>

>> > Which version of SCons are you using now?

>> > Could you use the scons-local distribution?

>> >

>>

>> The product is open source, so we can't rely on users (users in this

>> case being developers or downstream distro packagers building the

>> product from source) having anything other than stable and released

>> SCons versions at their disposal.

>>

>> Thanks,

>> Andrew

>>

>> _______________________________________________

>> Scons-users mailing list

>> Scons-users at scons.org

>> http://four.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-users

>

>

>

> _______________________________________________

> Scons-users mailing list

> Scons-users at scons.org

> http://four.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-users

>



More information about the Scons-users mailing list