[Scons-users] style guide cheker

[Evan Driscoll]

On 01/03/2013 01:21 PM, William Deegan wrote:

> Phil,

> 

> Not sure how this is a response to my response.

> If you have a builder which does anything terribly significant, you'll

> find that due to python's GiL, you'll process you build much faster by

> moving the logic outside of SCons.

> So a standalone script vs a big script inside a python builder in SCons.


And of course, if you make it separate from SCons, it becomes more
broadly useful -- not everyone is using SCons (sadly).

Just because you have a separate tool doesn't mean that you can't
integrate it into SCons nicely enough. The SCons folks didn't say "we
want to compile stuff, let's implement a compiler in SCons". :-)

Evan

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 554 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
Url : <http://four.pairlist.net/pipermail/scons-users/attachments/20130103/f549e4db/attachment-0001.pgp>