[Scons-users] style guide cheker
Bill Deegan
bill at baddogconsulting.com
Wed Jan 2 13:13:23 EST 2013
Phil,
In general tools with significant logic should be run not inside SCons.
You won't be able to run -j and get the parallel execution that you would
with an external tool.
-Bill
On Wed, Jan 2, 2013 at 1:29 AM, Philipp Kraus <philipp.kraus at flashpixx.de>wrote:
> Thanks for this interessting link. I will take a look :-)
> A Scons-only way should be nice, because I need only "one-install-tool"
> for checking, so IMHO it can be a solution to migrate the external
> checking stuff
> into a Scons builder.
>
> Thanks a lot
>
> Phil
>
>
> Am 02.01.2013 um 10:13 schrieb Jos De Laender:
>
> > It's off course off-topic (except for the I like Scons part ;)) but I
> feel like you are re-inventing the wheel.
> > If it was my problem, I went for : http://uncrustify.sourceforge.net/ .
> > GUI ànd command-line that should be possible to integrate with Scons.
> >
> > Jos
> >
> > On 02-01-13 09:26, Philipp Kraus wrote:
> >> Hello,
> >>
> >> I need some ideas for the following problem: I use Scons for building
> C/C++ programs& shared libraries, but at the moment I would like to define
> a style guide of the code structure eg new line at the end of each file,
> camel-case naming etc
> >> I have searched for a tool, which support custom rules for define a
> style and checks my code base again these rules. I have found a Python
> script for the Google C++ Style Guide and this is a nice solution, but it
> does not support custom rules or changing defined rules.
> >>
> >> I love Scons and I have written some builders& emitters, so at the
> moment I would like to implementate an own style guide checker with Scons.
> I prefere a flexible definition of the rule set and configuration option,
> so the check
> >> should be create warning and exceptions. I think regular expressions
> are a good choice of beginning.
> >> The Scons emitter should be do nothing (input is equal to output) and
> the builder should run the checks, but the builder does not create any new
> file, so the input file should be the output file, does it?
> >>
> >> Does anybody know any helpfull tips or ideas?
> >>
> >> Thanks
> >>
> >> Phil
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Scons-users mailing list
> >> Scons-users at scons.org
> >> http://four.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-users
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> > --
> > Jos De Laender
> > www.jodela.be
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> Scons-users mailing list
> Scons-users at scons.org
> http://four.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-users
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://four.pairlist.net/pipermail/scons-users/attachments/20130102/6188ae68/attachment.html>
More information about the Scons-users
mailing list