[Scons-users] problem while compiling in parallel

[Jameel Shorosh]

Thanks !!!

On Friday, February 22, 2013, Kenny, Jason L wrote:


>  Given the return code issue, you might want to look at the exitstatfunc

> value in Action(). ( look at the man page) This allows you to map return

> code to a way SCons wants to see them.****

>

> ** **

>

> This might be helpful for your custom compiler tool.****

>

> ** **

>

> Good luck!****

>

> Jason****

>

> ** **

>

> *From:* scons-users-bounces at scons.org <javascript:_e({}, 'cvml',

> 'scons-users-bounces at scons.org');> [mailto:scons-users-bounces at scons.org<javascript:_e({}, 'cvml', 'scons-users-bounces at scons.org');>]

> *On Behalf Of *Jameel Shorosh

> *Sent:* Thursday, February 21, 2013 4:05 PM

> *To:* SCons users mailing list

> *Subject:* Re: [Scons-users] problem while compiling in parallel****

>

> ** **

>

> Hi****

>

> Please ignore , i found the bug in my customized area (the customized

> compiler command was not always returning the right return code  so scons

> was continuing the build to link phase although the compilation command

> failed.****

>

> ** **

>

> Thanks Anyway****

>

> Jameel

>

> On Thursday, February 21, 2013, Jameel Shorosh wrote:****

>

> I just saw now thatin the latest version of scons one defect was fixed

> that is related to multi-threading run, I am wondering if it is related to

> the my case:****

>

>  ****

>

> """ From Alexey Klimkin:

>     - Fixed the Taskmaster, curing spurious build failures in

>       multi-threaded runs (#2720).

> """****

>

> On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 10:18 PM, Jameel Shorosh <jameel.shorosh at gmail.com>

> wrote:****

>

> Hi Jason,****

>

> Thanks for the reply.****

>

>  ****

>

> regrading 1 - Please note that the compilation of one of the files failed

> and the linkage shouldnt have started at all.****

>

> regrarding 2 - no I dont use -k.  (I feel it is somehow related to 1

> because things went out of synchronization****

>

>  ****

>

> Jameel****

>

> On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 9:59 PM, Kenny, Jason L <jason.l.kenny at intel.com>

> wrote:****

>

>   Problem 1: I only have seen this myself when there was something wrong

> with the depends tree. Well, I did see this once in windows ( which you are

> not using) because the tasked finished and the virus checker delayed the

> finial write or something to disk so it could check it. On Linux is has

> always been for me a bad depends tree.****

>

>  ****

>

> Problem 2: Do you have –k in the command line?****

>

>  ****

>

> Jason****

>

> ** **

>

> _______________________________________________

> Scons-users mailing list

> Scons-users at scons.org

> http://four.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-users****

>

>  ** **

>

> ** **

>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://four.pairlist.net/pipermail/scons-users/attachments/20130222/0d381025/attachment.html>