[Scons-users] Package on pypi

[Bill Deegan]

Matias,

bootstrap.py builds the various types of packages and documentation for
SCons.
(rpm, scons-local which you can just unzip/untar and use, and regular
source distribution among others)

Does that answer your question?
-Bill


On Mon, Aug 5, 2013 at 8:56 AM, Matías Iturburu <maturburu at gmail.com> wrote:


>

>

>

> 2013/8/1 Gary Oberbrunner <garyo at oberbrunner.com>

>

>> From the distribution, you should be able to do python setup.py install.

>>

>

> I know that. The question was, about why this is not along the source in

> bitbucket..

>

>

>> From the source, you have to bootstrap it first (or you can just use it

>> in place if you're testing).

>>

>

> This is what puzzles me. Why do we need to *bootstrap* scons? (Not what

> does bootstrap do, but why is it needed at all)

>

>

>> On Thu, Aug 1, 2013 at 11:17 AM, Matías Iturburu <maturburu at gmail.com>wrote:

>>

>>> I'm looking at scons' source and there is no setup.py.

>>> How is this supposed to be packed?

>>> I know scons detailed installation instructions, but those doesn't look

>>> like any other package I've seen.

>>> Is there some burden to package scons like a regular python package on

>>> pypi?

>>>

>>>

>>> 2013/7/31 Matías Iturburu <maturburu at gmail.com>

>>>

>>>> Cool!

>>>> Thanks for the quick answer.

>>>> I'm maintaining a set of tools on top of scons and having it

>>>> easy-installable would be sweet.

>>>>

>>>>

>>>>

>>>> 2013/7/31 William Deegan <bill at baddogconsulting.com>

>>>>

>>>>> Matias,

>>>>>

>>>>> We are working on getting the rights to upgrade from the previous

>>>>> maintainer.

>>>>> Hopefully update soon.

>>>>>

>>>>> -Bill

>>>>> On Jul 31, 2013, at 6:22 AM, Matías Iturburu <maturburu at gmail.com>

>>>>> wrote:

>>>>>

>>>>> Hello list.

>>>>> I see the package on pypi is kinda old

>>>>> https://pypi.python.org/pypi/SCons/0.92.

>>>>> There is another package somewhat newer (

>>>>> https://pypi.python.org/pypi/sc0ns) but still not the latest and

>>>>> under a more criptic name.

>>>>> What would be needed to update the "official" package?

>>>>> Also: Why's that no one is maintaining it? No one uses it?

>>>>>

>>>>>

>>>>> Best regards.

>>>>> --

>>>>> Matías Iturburu

>>>>> http://www.linkedin.com/in/tutuca | http://ltmo.com.ar

>>>>>  _______________________________________________

>>>>> Scons-users mailing list

>>>>> Scons-users at scons.org

>>>>> http://four.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-users

>>>>>

>>>>>

>>>>>

>>>>> _______________________________________________

>>>>> Scons-users mailing list

>>>>> Scons-users at scons.org

>>>>> http://four.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-users

>>>>>

>>>>>

>>>>

>>>>

>>>> --

>>>> Matías Iturburu

>>>> http://www.linkedin.com/in/tutuca | http://ltmo.com.ar

>>>>

>>>

>>>

>>>

>>> --

>>> Matías Iturburu

>>> http://www.linkedin.com/in/tutuca | http://ltmo.com.ar

>>>

>>> _______________________________________________

>>> Scons-users mailing list

>>> Scons-users at scons.org

>>> http://four.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-users

>>>

>>>

>>

>>

>> --

>> Gary

>>

>> _______________________________________________

>> Scons-users mailing list

>> Scons-users at scons.org

>> http://four.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-users

>>

>>

>

>

> --

> Matías Iturburu

> http://www.linkedin.com/in/tutuca | http://ltmo.com.ar

>

> _______________________________________________

> Scons-users mailing list

> Scons-users at scons.org

> http://four.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-users

>

>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://four.pairlist.net/pipermail/scons-users/attachments/20130805/f4b104b2/attachment.htm