[kj] OT: Earphones

[Janean Lancaster]

The thing with in-ears is the all-purpose convenience, although I do 
daydream of having a top pair of over-ear real headphones as well.  But 
I imagine you have to spend much more for decent over-ears than decent 
in-ears.  And I'm on a budget now I'm back on the dole (thanks to the 
Tories)...

On 29/06/2012 16:33, folk devil wrote:

> Get yourself some decent AKGs or similar. Fuck the 

> in-earphones..thery're really bad for your ears.

> Just get some 'closed' real headphones :)

>

> ------------------------------------------------------------------------

> Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2012 15:44:51 +0100

> From: j at jlancaster.info

> To: gathering at misera.net

> Subject: [kj] OT: Earphones

>

> Seeing as you are all music connoisseurs, advice for my next pair of 

> earphones is requested.

>

> My latest in a long line of earphones have just broken (at the jack 

> plug, sound in the left ear was going and has now gone) and I am 

> completely lost without them.

>

> I had Klipsch Image S4s - they sounded great, if a little buzzy on low 

> frequencies.  I like the in-ear buds because they block external noise 

> really well and no-one else has to suffer (or complain about) my 

> choice of choons.

>

> I seem to be replacing earphones every 15 months or so, which is a 

> complete pisser.  But they do get heavy use.

>

> Thanks,

> Janean

>

>

>

> _______________________________________________ Gathering mailing list 

> Gathering at misera.net http://four.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/gathering

>

>

> _______________________________________________

> Gathering mailing list

> Gathering at misera.net

> http://four.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/gathering



-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://four.pairlist.net/pipermail/gathering/attachments/20120629/554a08a2/attachment.html>