[kj] Gathering Digest, Vol 110, Issue 60

[F Luke]

C. People who have nothing to say and who post abusive posts to others who have something to say...which is actually trolling.If you have something to add, please do, if not, then dont just name call, otherwise if others respond likewise, it will just turn into a pointless slanging match .




Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2012 21:53:03 +0100
From: jimharper666 at yahoo.co.uk
To: gathering at misera.net
Subject: Re: [kj] Gathering Digest, Vol 110, Issue 60

I don't know what's worse- (a) a troll, or (b) a troll who thinks he's actually being funny.

 
Jim.
 




From: "jpwhkj at aol.com" <jpwhkj at aol.com>
To: gathering at misera.net 
Sent: Wednesday, 22 August 2012, 21:40
Subject: Re: [kj] Gathering Digest, Vol 110, Issue 60



Next you'll be telling us Pussy Riot deserved everything they got.


-----Original Message-----
From: F Luke <fluke1 at live.co.uk>
To: gathering <gathering at misera.net>
Sent: Wed, 22 Aug 2012 14:26
Subject: Re: [kj] Gathering Digest, Vol 110, Issue 60



Jaz isnt Killing Joke, its up to the band to issue statements through the proper channels .
Cormac needs to apply for the position of Killing Jokes manager or P.R before he makes statements on their behalf.
KJ are quite capable of posting their own messages on Facebook, so its irrelevant whether Jaz has any comprehension of it or not.
 
 

 



From: louiecipher33 at hotmail.com
To: gathering at misera.net
Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2012 13:19:17 +0000
Subject: Re: [kj] Gathering Digest, Vol 110, Issue 60




A drunken private rant ?
I thought Jaz had already given up drink by the time he asked for the statement to be issued.
Not Cormac's fault if Jaz has no comprehension of facebook


 




From: fluke1 at live.co.uk
To: gathering at misera.net
Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2012 13:16:12 +0000
Subject: Re: [kj] Gathering Digest, Vol 110, Issue 60




No, they are two separate  issues , updating the Website and issuing messages are two separate things.
My point was that if KJ wanted to cancel their tour , they can announce it in an official capacity after it being agreed on by all of them (KJ) , not after Jaz had a drunken private rant with someone .
 



From: Per.G.Olsson at Miljonmysteriet.com
Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2012 15:06:35 +0200
To: gathering at misera.net
Subject: Re: [kj] Gathering Digest, Vol 110, Issue 60

Regarding #3) 
No, they're not - nor are their "management".
Down by the river and the Cult/Mission/KJ Tour (still listed on the official KJ site, along with the Metropolis $$$gig & the gig cancelled in Sweden) are proof of this.


/Per





22 aug 2012 kl. 14.54 skrev F Luke:


1. I didnt say that it was cormacs fault .
2. I dont believe that Jaz asked Cormac to distribute the message .
3 . KJ are quite capable of issuing their own messages .
 
 

 



Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2012 10:31:46 +0100
From: jimharper666 at yahoo.co.uk
To: gathering at misera.net
Subject: Re: [kj] Gathering Digest, Vol 110, Issue 60



Of course it's Cormac's fault! He'll think twice next time Jaz gives him messages to distribute...

 
 




From: F Luke <fluke1 at live.co.uk>
To: "gathering at misera.net" <gathering at misera.net> 
Sent: Wednesday, 22 August 2012, 8:44
Subject: Re: [kj] Gathering Digest, Vol 110, Issue 60




That is quite an exaggeration, Cormac hasnt been left to die . 
Maybe in future he should wait for KJ to make an official statement, rather than trying to speak on their behalf .
Jaz has been
 left to pick up the pieces which were the result of Cormacs posts .
Cormac should
 accept some of the blame for the whole fiasco , even so, Jaz didnt make any accusations or name anyone.




From: fatpotanga at gmail.com
Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2012 08:40:20 +0100
To: gathering at misera.net
Subject: Re: [kj] Gathering Digest, Vol 110, Issue 60

Again, that's exactly how I feel. 
I couldn't care less about the 'chaos surrounds us get on with it' thing - we all know the unpredictability of the beast.
It's the ridiculous cover up & such painfully embarrassing lies.
Jaz being dressed as a woman & shoved on the lifeboat while pushing Cormac overboard to distract the sharks has left a very sour taste 



On 15 Aug 2012, at 23:44, jpwhkj at aol.com wrote:

No offence taken.  Here's my viewpoint:
 
Yes, it would be nice if you could rely on KJ to show up when they say they will.  However, you can't.
 
But that's not the thing that really gets me - which is the utterly lame excuses, and the idea that somehow it's just like that, 'cos it's Killing Joke, y'know.
_______________________________________________ Gathering mailing list Gathering at misera.net http://four.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/gathering
_______________________________________________
Gathering mailing list
Gathering at misera.net
http://four.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/gathering



_______________________________________________ Gathering mailing list Gathering at misera.net http://four.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/gathering_______________________________________________
Gathering mailing list
Gathering at misera.net
http://four.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/gathering


_______________________________________________ Gathering mailing list Gathering at misera.net http://four.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/gathering
_______________________________________________ Gathering mailing list Gathering at misera.net http://four.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/gathering
_______________________________________________ Gathering mailing list Gathering at misera.net http://four.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/gathering
_______________________________________________
Gathering mailing list
Gathering at misera.net
http://four.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/gathering

_______________________________________________
Gathering mailing list
Gathering at misera.net
http://four.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/gathering



_______________________________________________
Gathering mailing list
Gathering at misera.net
http://four.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/gathering 		 	   		  
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://four.pairlist.net/pipermail/gathering/attachments/20120823/388c5fa1/attachment-0001.html>