[kj] Gathering Digest, Vol 110, Issue 60
    Alexander Smith 
    vassifer at earthlink.net
       
    Wed Aug 22 23:39:51 EDT 2012
    
    
  
E-mail of the day!
On Aug 22, 2012, at 11:09 AM, jon chapman wrote:
> If you asked Geordie to write an official statement,he'd take a draw  
> of his Dunhill and then tell you to get fucked.
>
>
>
>
>
> From: fluke1 at live.co.uk
> To: gathering at misera.net
> Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2012 14:49:26 +0000
> Subject: Re: [kj] Gathering Digest, Vol 110, Issue 60
>
> Its quite a weak argument to make in saying that BPF cant be writing  
> the Official statements because he lives in the U.S.A and the time  
> difference (Considering that the internet is a 24 hour non stop  
> continuing entity), you then go on to making an even weaker argument  
> as to why Geordie cannot be writing the Official statements by  
> giving no reason at all !!!!!!!
>    A Killing Joke official statement  is a statement that all the  
> band agree upon .
>
>
> From: Per.G.Olsson at Miljonmysteriet.com
> Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2012 16:38:55 +0200
> To: gathering at misera.net
> Subject: Re: [kj] Gathering Digest, Vol 110, Issue 60
>
> 	I can't see which of the four members who should have written the  
> statements.
> 	Jaz? Big no-no
> 	Youth? Nope, his own messages have a completely different tone (&  
> spelling)
> 	Big Paul? Clocking in form the US at weird hours of the day?
> 	Geordie???
>
> 	No, they are written by management, hopefully in consultation with  
> (some parts of) KJ.
>
> 	/Per
>
> 22 aug 2012 kl. 16.21 skrev F Luke:
>
>
> Erm , A Statement by the Management IS an Official statement .
> One which contains the sentence " Part of what makes this band what  
> it is is the chaos that surrounds us all and we are unpredictable at  
> best." , which suggests that a band member is actually writing the  
> official statements and not the management, but never the less, an  
> official statement is an official statement and an official  
> statement would nt be released unless it was a statement that the  
> whole band agreed upon, thats why Jazs  statement has caused so many  
> problems .
>   They are all on the bands Facebook page , if you would like to  
> have a look
>
>
> From: louiecipher33 at hotmail.com
> To: gathering at misera.net
> Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2012 14:09:02 +0000
> Subject: Re: [kj] Gathering Digest, Vol 110, Issue 60
>
> I would like to see these official statements by the BAND as opposed  
> to management where are they ?
>
>
>
>
>
> From: fluke1 at live.co.uk
> To: gathering at misera.net
> Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2012 14:01:11 +0000
> Subject: Re: [kj] Gathering Digest, Vol 110, Issue 60
>
> That is incorrect, there have been numerous official statements by  
> the band on Facebook in the last few weeks alone.
> I wouldnt have posted anything, I would have told Jaz to go and  
> discuss his opinion about the tour with the other band members and  
> then post an official statement through the proper channels .
> From: louiecipher33 at hotmail.com
> To: gathering at misera.net
> Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2012 13:30:25 +0000
> Subject: Re: [kj] Gathering Digest, Vol 110, Issue 60
>
> It is up to the band but they are clearly not interested or don't  
> have the time.
> Cormac did not put himself up for the position he was asked as a  
> favour.
> In the circumstances i am sure we would all do the same
>
>
>
>
>
> From: fluke1 at live.co.uk
> To: gathering at misera.net
> Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2012 13:26:01 +0000
> Subject: Re: [kj] Gathering Digest, Vol 110, Issue 60
>
> Jaz isnt Killing Joke, its up to the band to issue statements  
> through the proper channels .
> Cormac needs to apply for the position of Killing Jokes manager or  
> P.R before he makes statements on their behalf.
> KJ are quite capable of posting their own messages on Facebook, so  
> its irrelevant whether Jaz has any comprehension of it or not.
>
>
>
>
> From: louiecipher33 at hotmail.com
> To: gathering at misera.net
> Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2012 13:19:17 +0000
> Subject: Re: [kj] Gathering Digest, Vol 110, Issue 60
>
>
> A drunken private rant ?
> I thought Jaz had already given up drink by the time he asked for  
> the statement to be issued.
> Not Cormac's fault if Jaz has no comprehension of facebook
>
>
>
>
> From: fluke1 at live.co.uk
> To: gathering at misera.net
> Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2012 13:16:12 +0000
> Subject: Re: [kj] Gathering Digest, Vol 110, Issue 60
>
> No, they are two separate  issues , updating the Website and issuing  
> messages are two separate things.
> My point was that if KJ wanted to cancel their tour , they can  
> announce it in an official capacity after it being agreed on by all  
> of them (KJ) , not after Jaz had a drunken private rant with someone .
>
> From: Per.G.Olsson at Miljonmysteriet.com
> Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2012 15:06:35 +0200
> To: gathering at misera.net
> Subject: Re: [kj] Gathering Digest, Vol 110, Issue 60
>
> Regarding #3)
> No, they're not - nor are their "management".
> Down by the river and the Cult/Mission/KJ Tour (still listed on the  
> official KJ site, along with the Metropolis $$$gig & the gig  
> cancelled in Sweden) are proof of this.
>
> /Per
>
>
> 22 aug 2012 kl. 14.54 skrev F Luke:
>
> 1. I didnt say that it was cormacs fault .
> 2. I dont believe that Jaz asked Cormac to distribute the message .
> 3 . KJ are quite capable of issuing their own messages .
>
>
>
>
> Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2012 10:31:46 +0100
> From: jimharper666 at yahoo.co.uk
> To: gathering at misera.net
> Subject: Re: [kj] Gathering Digest, Vol 110, Issue 60
>
> Of course it's Cormac's fault! He'll think twice next time Jaz gives  
> him messages to distribute...
>
>
> From: F Luke <fluke1 at live.co.uk>
> To: "gathering at misera.net" <gathering at misera.net>
> Sent: Wednesday, 22 August 2012, 8:44
> Subject: Re: [kj] Gathering Digest, Vol 110, Issue 60
>
> That is quite an exaggeration, Cormac hasnt been left to die .
> Maybe in future he should wait for KJ to make an official statement,  
> rather than trying to speak on their behalf .
> Jaz has been left to pick up the pieces which were the result of  
> Cormacs posts .
> Cormac should accept some of the blame for the whole fiasco , even  
> so, Jaz didnt make any accusations or name anyone.
>
> From: fatpotanga at gmail.com
> Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2012 08:40:20 +0100
> To: gathering at misera.net
> Subject: Re: [kj] Gathering Digest, Vol 110, Issue 60
>
> Again, that's exactly how I feel.
> I couldn't care less about the 'chaos surrounds us get on with it'  
> thing - we all know the unpredictability of the beast.
> It's the ridiculous cover up & such painfully embarrassing lies.
> Jaz being dressed as a woman & shoved on the lifeboat while pushing  
> Cormac overboard to distract the sharks has left a very sour taste
>
> On 15 Aug 2012, at 23:44, jpwhkj at aol.com wrote:
>
> No offence taken.  Here's my viewpoint:
>
> Yes, it would be nice if you could rely on KJ to show up when they  
> say they will.  However, you can't.
>
> But that's not the thing that really gets me - which is the utterly  
> lame excuses, and the idea that somehow it's just like that, 'cos  
> it's Killing Joke, y'know.
>
> _______________________________________________ Gathering mailing  
> list Gathering at misera.net http://four.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/gathering
>
> _______________________________________________
> Gathering mailing list
> Gathering at misera.net
> http://four.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/gathering
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________ Gathering mailing  
> list Gathering at misera.net http://four.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/gathering
> _______________________________________________
> Gathering mailing list
> Gathering at misera.net
> http://four.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/gathering
>
>
> _______________________________________________ Gathering mailing  
> list Gathering at misera.net http://four.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/gathering
>
> _______________________________________________ Gathering mailing  
> list Gathering at misera.net http://four.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/gathering
>
> _______________________________________________ Gathering mailing  
> list Gathering at misera.net http://four.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/gathering
>
> _______________________________________________ Gathering mailing  
> list Gathering at misera.net http://four.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/gathering
>
> _______________________________________________ Gathering mailing  
> list Gathering at misera.net http://four.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/gathering
>
> _______________________________________________ Gathering mailing  
> list Gathering at misera.net http://four.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/gathering
>
> _______________________________________________ Gathering mailing  
> list Gathering at misera.net http://four.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/gathering
> _______________________________________________
> Gathering mailing list
> Gathering at misera.net
> http://four.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/gathering
>
>
> _______________________________________________ Gathering mailing  
> list Gathering at misera.net http://four.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/gathering
>
> _______________________________________________ Gathering mailing  
> list Gathering at misera.net http://four.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/gathering
> _______________________________________________
> Gathering mailing list
> Gathering at misera.net
> http://four.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/gathering
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://four.pairlist.net/pipermail/gathering/attachments/20120822/2fd5fbec/attachment.html>
    
    
More information about the Gathering
mailing list