[kj] Jaz still AWOL
Alexander Smith
vassifer at earthlink.net
Mon Aug 20 08:08:14 EDT 2012
Bahahaha.
On Aug 20, 2012, at 4:53 AM, Brendan Quinn wrote:
> I wonder what Mnsr. Le Chevalier Coleman would've wrote.
>
> He might again suggest that people suicide bomb multinationals, and
> then promptly go and not do it himself.
>
>
> From: gathering-bounces at misera.net [mailto:gathering-bounces at misera.net
> ] On Behalf Of sade1
> Sent: Monday, 20 August 2012 10:25 a.m.
> To: A list about all things Killing Joke (the band!)
> Subject: Re: [kj] Jaz still AWOL
>
> I agree with you, they shouldn't have cut down the church's cross.
> Where else would cross'dressers hang their tinsel and garments if
> not their persecutors' bodies? (Hang not lest ye be hung?) The
> crosscutting was (to me, anyway) a misdirected intention from a
> usually pretty-good-at-protesting bunch of girls. What got to me was
> when they toppled the Eurocup on display. I jsut felt wrong to watch.
>
> Here is the closing statement from one of the band, at close of
> trial. It's got lots to say:
> Read this closing statement from a member of the imprisoned group
> Pussy Riot.
> Yekaterina Samutsevich’s closing statement in the criminal case
> against the feminist punk group Pussy Riot.
>
> "During the closing statement, the defendant is expected to repent
> or express regret for her deeds, or to enumerate attenuating cir
> cumstances. In my case, as in the case of my colleagues in the
> group, this is completely unnecessary. Instead, I want to express my
> views about the causes of what has happened with us.
>
> The fact that Christ the Savior Cathedral had become a significant
> symbol in the political strategy of our powers that be was already
> clear to many thinking people when Vladimir Putin’s former [KGB]
> colleague Kirill Gundyaev took over as head of the Russian Orthodox
> Church. After this happened, Christ the Savior Cathedral began to be
> used openly as a flashy setting for the politics of the security
> services, which are the main source of power [in Russia].
>
> Why did Putin feel the need to exploit the Orthodox religion and its
> aesthetics? After all, he could have employed his own, far more
> secular tools of power—for example, national corporations, or his
> menacing police system, or his own obedient judiciary system. It may
> be that the tough, failed policies of Putin’s government, the
> incident with the submarine Kursk, the bombings of civilians in
> broad daylight, and other unpleasant moments in his political career
> forced him to ponder the fact that it was high time to resign;
> otherwise, the citizens of Russia would help him do this.
> Apparently, it was then that he felt the need for more convincing,
> transcendental guarantees of his long tenure at the helm. It was
> here that the need arose to make use of the aesthetics of the
> Orthodox religion, historically associated with the heyday of
> Imperial Russia, where power came not from earthly manifestations
> such as democratic elections and civil society, but from God Himself.
>
> How did he succeed in doing this? After all, we still have a secular
> state, and shouldn’t any intersection of the religious and political
> spheres be dealt with severely by our vigilant and critically minded
> society? Here, apparently, the authorities took advantage of a
> certain deficit of Orthodox aesthetics in Soviet times, when the
> Orthodox religion had the aura of a lost history, of something
> crushed and damaged by the Soviet totalitarian regime, and was thus
> an opposition culture. The authorities decided to appropriate this
> historical effect of loss and present their new political project to
> restore Russia’s lost spiritual values, a project which has little
> to do with a genuine concern for preservation of Russian Orthodoxy’s
> history and culture.
>
> It was also fairly logical that the Russian Orthodox Church, which
> has long had a mystical connection with power, emerged as this
> project’s principal executor in the media. Moreover, it was also
> agreed that the Russian Orthodox Church, unlike the Soviet era, when
> the church opposed, above all, the crudeness of the authorities
> towards history itself, should also confront all baleful
> manifestations of contemporary mass culture, with its concept of
> diversity and tolerance.
>
> Implementing this thoroughly interesting political project has
> required considerable quantities of professional lighting and video
> equipment, air time on national TV channels for hours-long live
> broadcasts, and numerous background shoots for morally and ethically
> edifying news stories, where in fact the Patriarch’s well-
> constructed speeches would be pronounced, helping the faithful make
> the right political choice during the election campaign, a difficult
> time for Putin. Moreover, all shooting has to take place
> continuously; the necessary images must sink into the memory and be
> constantly updated, to create the impression of something natural,
> constant and compulsory.
>
> Our sudden musical appearance in the Cathedral of Christ the Savior
> with the song “Mother of God, Drive Putin Out” violated the
> integrity of this media image, generated and maintained by the
> authorities for so long, and revealed its falsity. In our
> performance we dared, without the Patriarch’s blessing, to combine
> the visual image of Orthodox culture and protest culture, suggesting
> to smart people that Orthodox culture belongs not only to the
> Russian Orthodox Church, the Patriarch and Putin, that it might also
> take the side of civic rebellion and protest in Russia.
>
> Perhaps such an unpleasant large-scale effect from our media
> intrusion into the cathedral was a surprise to the authorities
> themselves. First they tried to present our performance as the prank
> of heartless militant atheists. But they made a huge blunder, since
> by this time we were already known as an anti-Putin feminist punk
> band that carried out their media raids on the country’s major
> political symbols.
>
> In the end, considering all the irreversible political and symbolic
> losses caused by our innocent creativity, the authorities decided to
> protect the public from us and our nonconformist thinking. Thus
> ended our complicated punk adventure in the Cathedral of Christ the
> Savior.
>
> I now have mixed feelings about this trial. On the one hand, we now
> expect a guilty verdict. Compared to the judicial machine, we are
> nobodies, and we have lost. On the other hand, we have won. Now the
> whole world sees that the criminal case against us has been
> fabricated. The system cannot conceal the repressive nature of this
> trial. Once again, Russia looks different in the eyes of the world
> from the way Putin tries to present it at daily international
> meetings. All the steps toward a state governed by the rule of law
> that he promised have obviously not been made. And his statement
> that the court in our case will be objective and make a fair
> decision is another deception of the entire country and the
> international community. That is all. Thank you."
> from the Skylight Books fB. https://www.facebook.com/skylightbooks?ref=stream
>
> I wonder what Mnsr. Le Chevalier Coleman would've wrote.
> Written, i mean.
>
>
> Blessed are the Cracked for
> they let in the Light,
> others all are just a..
> 'nother brick in the Wall
>
> From: Rob Moss <rob.moss at gmx.com>
> To: A list about all things Killing Joke (the band!) <gathering at misera.net
> >
> Sent: Sunday, August 19, 2012 1:51 AM
> Subject: Re: [kj] Jaz still AWOL
>
>
> I really think these people who protest so violently against the
> church are kind of missing the point.
>
> I'm no fan of the church. Headcount lyrics would confirm that, but
> is there anything to be gained in vandalizing a church? I just don't
> get it. It's like the most petulant and holiday way in which to
> protest.
>
> Ok girls. No one is listening to our records. How do we make our
> point. Oh I know. Let's pick on the church.
> Yeah. Beat the shit out of a cripple too why don't you I you want
> shock value!
>
> Should Pussy Riot have gone to jail? Of course not. Should they have
> made a smarter protest? Yes. Of course they should protest. If we
> don't protest we are cannot call ourselves intelligent life IMO and
> Putin? Well.......
>
> The St Paul's protesters had the sense to not storm the church. That
> would have guaranteed a harsher reaction. PR could have picked a
> clever target. Maybe a bag of liver and maggots at the local music
> rag might be an idea.....
>
>
> On 19 Aug 2012, at 05:14, sade1 <saulomar1 at yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> >
> > There is a video of those oh-so-delicioux protest godesses FEMEN
> responding to the Pusssy Riot issue w/a Breast Bash of their own by
> chopping down the High Holy Crucifix outside the local Orthodox
> Church. WITH a chainsaw. =:~o +:~* Wendy O Williams would've been so
> very, very proud of them. Amn't at my 'puter so cnt post da Utube
> link.
> > ------------------------------
> > On Sat, Aug 18, 2012 4:48 PM PDT Brendan Quinn wrote:
> >
> >> Pussy Riot have hopefully wiped any last bit of interest anyone
> had in the Coleman saga, thank god.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> From: gathering-bounces at misera.net [mailto:gathering-bounces at misera.net
> ] On Behalf Of pssyche23
> >> Sent: Saturday, 18 August 2012 6:36 a.m.
> >> To: A list about all things Killing Joke (the band!)
> >> Cc: gathering at misera.net
> >> Subject: Re: [kj] Jaz still AWOL
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> Sent from my iPhone
> >>
> >>
> >> On 13 Aug 2012, at 11:27, jpwhkj at aol.com wrote:
> >>
> >> The Guardian website actually had this relatively prominent.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> http://www.guardian.co.uk/music/2012/aug/13/killing-joke-jaz-coleman-resurfaces
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> The last line is particularly comic:
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> "Nevertheless, there remain signs of friction within Killing
> Joke. On Sunday morning, just one hour before Coleman's comeback
> statement, Killing Joke called off a gig on 8 September "due to Jaz
> still not surfacing". That concert, at London's Metropolis Studios,
> was due to be recorded for a live DVD."
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> So, not due to the fact that only one ticket has been sold, to Mr
> A. Adamiak of west London?
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> Jamie
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> Definitely not me - the facebook event suggested 40 "guests" but
> likely only 10% of those actually bought a ticket.
> >>
> > _______________________________________________
> > Gathering mailing list
> > Gathering at misera.net
> > http://four.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/gathering
> _______________________________________________
> Gathering mailing list
> Gathering at misera.net
> http://four.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/gathering
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Gathering mailing list
> Gathering at misera.net
> http://four.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/gathering
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://four.pairlist.net/pipermail/gathering/attachments/20120820/b5b898b9/attachment-0001.html>
More information about the Gathering
mailing list