[kj] Never a new topic OTG

[Paul Rangecroft]

Yes, that was what I was referring to.

I don't have a problem with unusual time signatures - obviously they have
that unsettling quality that is a trademark of KJ - but I have no "time" for
numerology.

The changes in tempo and 5/4 time used on ED&VRE worked better I thought.
Love the half bar (if that's what it is) before "MONEY IS NOT OUR GOD!" too.

Jaz was becoming an accomplished composer by then and it was probably a
natural progression to start exploring that sort of thing but... well, give
me a good Geordie riff and that'll work just fine in 4/4 time
thankyouverymuchindeed!

On Fri, Sep 23, 2011 at 8:40 AM, fatpotanga <fatpotanga at gmail.com> wrote:


> I remember a letter from Jaz (ODIC perhaps?) saying one had 103 bpm (The

> Calling if I remember correctly, which again is doubtful) & as "I write

> this, the tv drones on behind me…" flight 103 had exploded over Lockerbie

>

>

> On 22 Sep 2011, at 23:49, Paul Rangecroft wrote:

>

> OTG the track has 13/12 on in. Tempo was determined by numerology according

> to 'The Courtauld Talks' sleeve notes.

>

> On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 11:29 PM, folk devil <folk.devil at hotmail.com>

> wrote:

>

>> You could say that about anything with a rhythm, though..S'all math(s) ;)

>>

>> Anyone know what these said timings are?...At an aural glance they all

>> pretty much sound 4/4 or 16s...I can't really get past the glossiness of

>> OTG, so I may have missed a couple of 16/7 beats etc...

>>

>

> _______________________________________________

> Gathering mailing list

> Gathering at misera.net

> http://four.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/gathering

>

>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://four.pairlist.net/pipermail/gathering/attachments/20110923/4f64290d/attachment.html>