[kj] FW: Michael Jackson dead
Floren Luke
fluke1 at live.co.uk
Mon Jun 29 19:38:51 EDT 2009
A Mole down there squeezing certain parts could be his technique that he uses to hit those high notes.
*How do hit those high notes Michael?*
"Its Sha mole"
From: jo at arcadia.karoo.co.uk
To: gathering at misera.net
Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2009 00:21:07 +0100
Subject: Re: [kj] FW: Michael Jackson dead
I bet they removed whichever sporran or mole it was in the second autopsy. However, it is flimsy evidence, this mole spotting business - perhaps he's a naturist or shared a urinal <shrug>?
What kind of Mole are we talking about ?
If it was the kind of Mole that you get in your garden, then it would have been quite apparent .
Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2009 15:38:00 -0700
From: saulomar1 at yahoo.com
To: gathering at misera.net
Subject: Re: [kj] FW: Michael Jackson dead
> ..it was all very his-word-against-the-other, with not a great deal of evidence either way...
A couple of other things of note..
-- maybe some parents accepted the money in lieu of a courtfight so they can be done with it all and just be able
to get their kid whatever therapy and help he'll need to recover.
-- also, as PW wrote here earlier, didn't one of the kids accurately describe MJ's penis and its mole/s anyway?
I can't think of any other way he could do that, barring hearing MJ describe it to someone else.
... ... ... ... ... ...
[looking at the current state of things..]
'Save me...
save me from Tomorrow..
I don't want to sail in this Ship Of Fools...'
From: Jim Harper <jimharper666 at yahoo.co.uk>
To: A list about all things Killing Joke (the band!) <gathering at misera.net>
Sent: Monday, June 29, 2009 7:44:24 AM
Subject: Re: [kj] FW: Michael Jackson dead
I might take the money if the police/district attorney refused to pursue the matter through the criminal courts; after all, it was all very his-word-against-the-other, with not a great deal of evidence either way, the kind of case the police/DA are wary of taking on even without a megacelebrity involved. Getting a case through the civil courts is easier than a criminal trial, because the burden of evidence is lower. It worked with OJ. Besides, if taking the money suggests the kids and their parents are lying through their teeth, offering them money (as opposed to definitively trying to prove his innocence) suggests Jackson was guilty.
--- On Mon, 29/6/09, ade <ade at the-lab.zetnet.co.uk> wrote:
I mean, if he fucked YOUR
kids, wouldn't you want to kick his face in until it was nothing more than mince & tiny bits of plastic?
If you managed to stop yourself from doing that, wouldn't you persue him relentlessly through the courts?
Or would you just take a pay-off & be the money-grubbing scumbag you always were?
View your Twitter and Flickr updates from one place - Learn more!
_______________________________________________
Gathering mailing list
Gathering at misera.net
http://four.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/gathering
_________________________________________________________________
MSN straight to your mobile - news, entertainment, videos and more.
http://clk.atdmt.com/UKM/go/147991039/direct/01/
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://four.pairlist.net/pipermail/gathering/attachments/20090629/13375760/attachment.html>
More information about the Gathering
mailing list