[kj] mark of the beast closer than expected

[Brendan]

http://www.cleanproduction.org/library/BFR%20Dust%20on%20Computers.pdf

The above rudimentary study found brominated chemical residue on every
sample of computer equipment they tested. There's a dearth of research into
the effects of multiple chemical exposure, and the effect of electromagnetic
radiation on the composition, dispersal etc of the chemicals. Sounds like
whacky stuff (which has made it easy to dismiss), but it's pretty basic
science that EM fields can affect chemical / biological structures. (e.g
sulight...duh)

Because these chemicals build up in the body, low levels of deca-BDE and
other brominated chemicals found in the dust samples, no matter how small
the amounts, are cause for concern as this study among others demonstrates
that these chemicals are ubiquitous in

our environment and immediately available for human ingestion. PBDEs and
related compounds are turning up just about everywhere scientists look for
them, up and down the food chain, in sediments, beluga whales, seals, bird
eggs, and human milk, serum and adipose

tissue5. As such, the levels found in this study cannot be evaluated in
isolation, since we are vulnerable to multiple low level exposures in our
homes and workplaces, through the food we eat, the dust we touch and the air
we breathe.

 <http://www.cleanproduction.org/library/BFR%20Dust%20on%20Computers.pdf>  
 

  _____  

From: gathering-bounces at misera.net [mailto:gathering-bounces at misera.net] On
Behalf Of sade1
Sent: Friday, 17 July 2009 7:19 AM
To: A list about all things Killing Joke (the band!)
Subject: Re: [kj] mark of the beast closer than expected


Thanks for that, as i had no idea of PC gear toxicity. This all further
supports my postAmish
<http://images.search.yahoo.com/images/view?back=http%3A%2F%2Fimages.search.
yahoo.com%2Fsearch%2Fimages%3Fp%3Dmodern%2Bamish%26ei%3DUTF-8%26rd%3Dpref%26
fr%3Dyfp-t-830%26fr2%3Dtab-web&w=419&h=432&imgurl=static.flickr.com%2F1212%2
F1481356416_57cacd5afe.jpg&rurl=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.flickr.com%2Fphotos%2Fwavet
raced%2F1481356416%2F&size=90k&name=The+Modern+Amish...&p=modern+amish&oid=1
d5475b9cb240104&fr2=tab-web&fusr=wavetraced&no=3&tt=645&sigr=11jinn310&sigi=
11g9dlfpv&sigb=135anrjsc> tendencies. 
And I feel the same way about the cellphones. 
 
 
... ... ... ... ... ... 

[looking at the current state of things..]
 
'Save me...
  save me from Tomorrow..
    I don't want to sail in this Ship Of Fools...'   
 


  _____  

From: Brendan <bq at soundgardener.co.nz>
To: A list about all things Killing Joke (the band!) <gathering at misera.net>
Sent: Wednesday, July 15, 2009 8:01:38 PM
Subject: Re: [kj] mark of the beast closer than expected


California has / had a law about furniture needing to be fire resistant to x
standard, (can withstand open flame without catching fire for x seconds or
something) that required high concentrations of chemical flame retardants,
bisphenol A amongst others if memory serves. That's come under the spotlight
recently as the chemicals are used on computer circuit boards as flame
retardant. The computer industry created a new certification system called
ROHS, reduction of harmful substances, to reduce or stop the use of those
amongst other toxic chemicals as they were causing 'issues'. I generally
only buy something if it complies with that. Computers have all sorts of
chemicals in them, LCD screens in particular, none of which have been tested
in combination (only indivually) to come up with toxicity levels, and I
don't think their behaviour under the influence of various forms of
electromagnetic radiation has been thoroughly tested either. Back in the day
some people used to get quite sick from the old CRT monitors, in fact many
IT depts would burn them in by leaving them on in a room for their first
week to burn out some of the initial high concentrations of chems. Oh and
some laser printers (esp the cheaper ones) have now been found to put toxic
amounts of fine toner into the air...research continues. Personally I limit
my use of cellphones as well, I don't believe they are safe in high doses
long term.

  _____  

From: gathering-bounces at misera.net [mailto:gathering-bounces at misera.net] On
Behalf Of folk devil
Sent: Thursday, 16 July 2009 2:28 AM
To: gathering at misera.net
Subject: Re: [kj] mark of the beast closer than expected


I haven't heard the expression 'raised sucking lead' for a while.
 
Asbestos is illegal in Cali. If it's where you live, report it.
NOW JPL and Rocket fuel in the ground soil is another matter..not that Mr
Bush cared..
 

  _____  

To: gathering at misera.net
Date: Wed, 15 Jul 2009 11:46:53 -0400
From: countessghoulita at aol.com
Subject: Re: [kj] mark of the beast closer than expected


Exactly. 

And I'd add asbestos in buildings, chemicals used to fix dyes to fabric,
etc. etc. All elements no one can avoid.



-----Original Message-----
From: folk devil <folk.devil at hotmail.com>
To: gathering at misera.net
Sent: Wed, Jul 15, 2009 8:25 am
Subject: Re: [kj] mark of the beast closer than expected


The environment affects our health, too ;)
 

  _____  


  _____  

Lauren found her dream laptop. Find the PC that
<http://www.microsoft.com/windows/choosepc/?ocid=ftp_val_wl_290> 's right
for you. 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://four.pairlist.net/pipermail/gathering/attachments/20090717/26a204f1/attachment.htm>