[kj] palin ban

The Exorcist killingjoke at theimmortalfool.com
Mon Sep 8 20:11:11 EDT 2008


Hmmm, I sound like a GOP operative because I'm against blatant lies
and fictional
ideas pulled out of thin air?

Good to know.

Sincerely,
Me

At 06:41 PM 9/8/2008, Karen Weil wrote:

>Because you just sound like a GOP operative; and if Obama had done

>or said half of some of the things Palin did, you'd be going ballistic.

>Does Obama have his flaws? You'd better believe it. However, I'll

>take those any day over McCain's any day. And maybe I'll stop with

>the "invective" when you stop with yours.

>Fair enough?

>

>kw.

>----- Original Message -----

>From: <mailto:killingjoke at theimmortalfool.com>The Exorcist

>To: <mailto:gathering at misera.net>A list about all things Killing

>Joke (the band!)

>Sent: Monday, September 08, 2008 2:59 PM

>Subject: Re: [kj] palin ban

>

>Rather than throwing invective it would be nicer to have a reply to my points.

>

>Cheers,

>Me

>

>At 02:51 PM 9/8/2008, Karen Weil wrote:

>>OK, Exorcist: Why don't you just go work for her campaign?

>>kw..

>>----- Original Message -----

>>From: <mailto:killingjoke at theimmortalfool.com>The Exorcist

>>To: <mailto:fluwdot at earthlink.net>fluw ;

>><mailto:gathering at misera.net>A list about all things Killing Joke (the band!)

>>Sent: Saturday, September 06, 2008 9:01 PM

>>Subject: Re: [kj] palin ban

>>Just like she did NOT ban any books nor did she try to IMPOSE

>>creationism in classes

>>I think it's quite fair to state that she would NOT ban KJ related

>>stuff. If this is the most

>>extreme stuff that you think exists you need to do a tad more reading.

>>It's nice to make presumptions based on no facts but reaching for

>>straws gets tiresome

>>after a while does it not?

>>

>>At 08:33 PM 9/6/2008, fluw wrote:

>>>how many people on the gathering doubt if sarah palin were to

>>>become aware of killing joke cd's or, (haha finally) a jaz coleman

>>>book in a library, she would not have them banned?

>>>as a killing joke fan, would you be apposed to this banning?

>>>as your nations VP and following a very likely health failure from

>>>Mc Cain, she would then be your president and the most powerful

>>>nutcase in the world, are you comfortable with her decision making?

>>>or would you rather she just go back to running cliff's state like

>>>a despot on a runaway train and get with a proper sex reassignment

>>>surgery and promptly get on with giving her twin wynona judd a

>>>stiff ass to mouth?

>>>i vote for giving it to wynona

>>>_______________________________________________

>>>Gathering mailing list

>>>Gathering at misera.net

>>>http://four.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/gathering

>>Competition is a barbaric, insensitive ritual that reeks of social

>>Darwinism.

>>We cannot allow the fittest to survive on our pages. Your loss is someone

>>else's gain, and your gain is someone else's loss. Therefore,

>>losers contribute

>>to the society and winners take away from it. Being a winner is

>>unethical, while

>>a society of losers is happy and striving as a collective. In the

>>spirit of diversity,

>>inclusiveness, and collectivism our contests shall have no winners.

>>Everyone is declared a loser, which in our book means an ethical

>>team player.

>>

>>

>>----------

>>_______________________________________________

>>Gathering mailing list

>>Gathering at misera.net

>>http://four.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/gathering

>>

>>_______________________________________________

>>Gathering mailing list

>>Gathering at misera.net

>>http://four.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/gathering

>

>Competition is a barbaric, insensitive ritual that reeks of social Darwinism.

>We cannot allow the fittest to survive on our pages. Your loss is someone

>else's gain, and your gain is someone else's loss. Therefore, losers

>contribute

>to the society and winners take away from it. Being a winner is

>unethical, while

>a society of losers is happy and striving as a collective. In the

>spirit of diversity,

>inclusiveness, and collectivism our contests shall have no winners.

>Everyone is declared a loser, which in our book means an ethical team player.

>

>

>----------

>_______________________________________________

>Gathering mailing list

>Gathering at misera.net

>http://four.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/gathering

>

>_______________________________________________

>Gathering mailing list

>Gathering at misera.net

>http://four.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/gathering


Competition is a barbaric, insensitive ritual that reeks of social Darwinism.
We cannot allow the fittest to survive on our pages. Your loss is someone
else's gain, and your gain is someone else's loss. Therefore, losers contribute
to the society and winners take away from it. Being a winner is
unethical, while
a society of losers is happy and striving as a collective. In the
spirit of diversity,
inclusiveness, and collectivism our contests shall have no winners.
Everyone is declared a loser, which in our book means an ethical team player.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://four.pairlist.net/pipermail/gathering/attachments/20080908/a12abe22/attachment.html>


More information about the Gathering mailing list