[kj] OT - List of books Sarah Palin wanted banned

[cliffmonka at alaska.net]

why u wanna know,u looking for a date or something?




> Anal fixation Cliff? :)

>

> Cheers,

> Me

>

> At 03:14 PM 9/7/2008, cliffmonka at alaska.net wrote:

>>the next person to disagree and stand up with an

>>opinion,get's it up the bum from

>>Sarah ImPalin with a horse sized strap on.

>>

>>

>> > The point is that they're as bad as each other mate.

>> >

>> > -----Original Message-----

>> > From: gathering-bounces at misera.net

>> [mailto:gathering-bounces at misera.net]On Behalf

>> > Of Alexander Smith

>> > Sent: 07 September 2008 17:15

>> > To: A list about all things Killing Joke (the band!)

>> > Subject: Re: [kj] OT - List of books Sarah Palin wanted banned

>> >

>> >

>> >

>> > " I find it sad that the people who claim to

>> be "liberal" would go and shut down

>> > and shout down anyone who doesn't agree with them."

>> >

>> >

>> > What exactly do you think the

>> Right/Conservative/Republicans are doing? Sitting

>> > quietly with the fingers entwined?

>> >

>> >

>> > Alex in NYC

>> >

>> >

>> > On Sep 7, 2008, at 8:28 AM, ade wrote:

>> >

>> >

>> >>Though in all honesty... I think it goes

>> beyond republican/democrat left/right. I

>> >> was always pro free speech & transparency. I

>> find it sad that the people who claim

>> >> to be "liberal" would go and shut down and

>> shout down anyone who doesn't agree

>> >> with them.

>> >

>> > Spot-on. This is the truth of free speech -

>> the chosen 'enemy' should have as much

>> > right to spout their utterances as the chosen 'heroes'.

>> >

>> > Sadly, this is how Hitler got in.

>> >

>> > Back when the Greeks began voting, at the

>> dawn of democracy (lol), did they not

>> > vote for war time & time again?

>> >

>> >

>> >

>> > -----Original Message-----

>> > From: gathering-bounces at misera.net [

>> mailto:gathering-bounces at misera.net]On Behalf

>> > Of The Exorcist

>> > Sent: 07 September 2008 00:26

>> > To: A list about all things Killing Joke (the band!)

>> > Subject: Re: [kj] OT - List of books Sarah Palin wanted banned

>> >

>> >

>> > I guess some things can't be explained ehhh?

>> LOL (Also a big SWANS fan amongst many

>> > many other bands.

>> > Music and books are my life. I guess I just

>> enjoy and can understand and relate to

>> > free expression in its many

>> > various forms.)

>> >

>> > Though in all honesty... I think it goes

>> beyond republican/democrat left/right.

>> >

>> > I was always pro free speech & transparency.

>> I find it sad that the people who

>> > claim to be "liberal" would

>> > go and shut down and shout down anyone who doesn't agree with them.

>> >

>> > (How many times have you seen a right wing or

>> conservative speaker being shouted

>> > down by lefties when invited

>> > to speak at a University?) When people feel

>> the need to disrupt someone's speech

>> > (Code Pink at the RNC?).

>> >

>> > I understand that people are different and I

>> respect it. I don't force my views on

>> > anyone and am more than willing

>> > to agree to disagree. More importantly, I

>> will always fight and support free Speech

>> > no matter to whom it applies!

>> >

>> > Cheers,

>> > Me

>> >

>> > Have a great weekend and hope the rain is gone by tomorrow.

>> >

>> >

>> > At 07:02 PM 9/6/2008, Alexander Smith wrote:

>> >

>> >

>> > It always amazes me how Yos the Exorcist can

>> be such a die-hard Republican and a

>> > die-hard Killing Joke fan at the same time.

>> To my mind, they cancel each other out

>> > -- but then, I'm a proudly liberal lefty and

>> still a Kiss fan, so I guess it's the

>> > same contradiction.

>> >

>> > Alex in NYC

>> >

>> >

>> >

>> > On Sep 6, 2008, at 6:52 PM, The Exorcist wrote:

>> >

>> >

>> >

>> > Yeah, just like saying that it wasn't her

>> child but her daughters. Truth doesn't

>> > matter. All you

>> > have to do is talk shit and make enough of a ruckus that people believe it.

>> >

>> > Speaking on the banning of things and

>> restriction of free speech let's look at Sir

>> > Obama's record.

>> >

>> > http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0808/12816.html

>> > Sen. Barack Obama has launched an all-out effort to block a Republican

>> > billionaire’s efforts to tie him

>> > to domestic and foreign terrorists in a wave of negative television ads.

>> >

>> > Obama’s campaign has written the Department of Justice demanding a criminal

>> > investigation of the “American Issues Project,”

>> > the vehicle through which Dallas investor Harold Simmons is financing the

>> > advertisements. The Obama campaign — and tens

>> > of thousands of supporters — also is

>> pressuring television networks and affiliates

>> > to reject the ads.

>> >

>> > OR...

>> >

>> http://www.swamppolitics.com/news/politics/blog/2008/08/obama_campaign_confronts_wgn_r.html

>> > (the above link is just a small snippet...

>> there are much more detailed ones out

>> > there)

>> >

>> > The fact that Obama tried to have Stanley

>> Kurtz thrown off the air for talking

>> > about the "Chicago Annenberg Challenge".

>> >

>> > "The magazine had been blocked in its initial

>> attempts to obtain records from the

>> > University of Illinois at Chicago regarding

>> > a school reform initiative called the Chicago

>> Annenberg Challenge, which Obama

>> > chaired and Ayers co-founded.

>> >

>> > Obama critics were quick to suggest that

>> political clout could be involved in

>> > seeking to protect Obama from embarrassment.

>> > The school later reserved its position and

>> made the records available Tuesday."

>> >

>> > So first they have the University block

>> access to the files. Then they threaten,

>> > flood and go after the radio station that will give Stanley

>> > a stage to talk at. BRAVO!!! Way to go!

>> >

>> > At least the Radio station offered the Obama

>> campaign to come on the show to

>> > discuss/refute what Stanley says (The Obama

>> > campaign declined.

>> >

>> > The ones throwing shit at Palin don't provide

>> that opportunity. While Stanley Kurtz

>> > and the Ad campaign (correct or incorrect)

>> > stated info based on Obama's past

>> associations the shit thrown at Palin is pulled

>> > out of thin air.

>> >

>> > Funny thing is, Palin isn't running to the

>> DOJ or sending out mass Emails telling

>> > people to wreak havoc.

>> >

>> > Sincerely,

>> > Me

>> >

>> >

>> > At 05:12 PM 9/6/2008, fluke fluke wrote:

>> >

>> >

>> > I dont see how you can judge a person  on the

>> basis of when they first got their

>> > passport .

>> > Also she didn't ban any books  whilst she was Mayor she just ............

>> >

>> > "Palin herself, questioned at the time,

>> called her inquiries rhetorical and simply

>> > part of a policy discussion with a department head "about understanding and

>> > following administration agendas," according to the Frontiersman article."

>> >

>> >    I abhor these Left Wing smear campaigns,

>> they are dishonest , deceitful and they

>> > distort the democratic process .

>> >

>> >

>> >

>> >

>> >

>> >

>> >

>> >

>> >> From: vassifer at earthlink.net

>> >> To: gathering at misera.net

>> >> Date: Sat, 6 Sep 2008 16:57:34 -0400

>> >> Subject: Re: [kj] OT - List of books Sarah Palin wanted banned

>> >>

>> >>

>> >> Like I said, it certainly fits her profile, though I'd be damn

>> >> surprised if she's even HEART of HALF of these books (woman didn't get

>> >> her first passport until 2007, for cryin' out loud).

>> >>

>> >> More to the point though: Regardless of title, the banning of ANY book

>> >> is completely fucked up.

>> >>

>> >> May she rot.

>> >>

>> >> Alex in NYC

>> >>

>> >>

>> >>

>> >> On Sep 6, 2008, at 4:22 PM, B. Oliver Sheppard wrote:

>> >>

>> >> > Wow, I know she had some deal with the library, and I hate this

>> >> > evil, hypocritical version of Tina Fey, but is that list accurate. I

>> >> > mean, LYSISTRATA? Banned?

>> >> >

>> >> > Part of me wouldn't doubt it -- but part of me insists on a

>> >> > snopes.com check.

>> >> >

>> >> > -Oliver

>> >> >

>> >> > LONESTYLE at aol.com wrote:

>> >> >> Check this one out...

>> >> >> ~LB

>> >> >>

>> >> >

>> >> > _______________________________________________

>> >> > Gathering mailing list

>> >> > Gathering at misera.net

>> >> > http://four.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/gathering

>> >>

>> >> _______________________________________________

>> >> Gathering mailing list

>> >> Gathering at misera.net

>> >> http://four.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/gathering

>> >

>> >

>> >

>> >   _____

>> >

>> > Try Facebook in Windows Live Messenger! Try it

>> > <http://clk.atdmt.com/UKM/go/111354030/direct/01/> Now!

>> > _______________________________________________

>> > Gathering mailing list

>> > Gathering at misera.net

>> > http://four.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/gathering

>> >

>> >

>> > Competition is a barbaric, insensitive ritual

>> that reeks of social Darwinism.

>> > We cannot allow the fittest to survive on our pages. Your loss is someone

>> > else's gain, and your gain is someone else's

>> loss. Therefore, losers contribute

>> > to the society and winners take away from it.

>> Being a winner is unethical, while

>> > a society of losers is happy and striving as a collective. In the spirit of

>> > diversity,

>> > inclusiveness, and collectivism our contests shall have no winners.

>> > Everyone is declared a loser, which in our

>> book means an ethical team player.

>> > _______________________________________________

>> > Gathering mailing list

>> > Gathering at misera.net

>> > http://four.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/gathering

>> >

>> >

>> > _______________________________________________

>> > Gathering mailing list

>> > Gathering at misera.net

>> > http://four.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/gathering

>> >

>> > Competition is a barbaric, insensitive ritual

>> that reeks of social Darwinism.

>> > We cannot allow the fittest to survive on our pages. Your loss is someone

>> > else's gain, and your gain is someone else's

>> loss. Therefore, losers contribute

>> > to the society and winners take away from it.

>> Being a winner is unethical, while

>> > a society of losers is happy and striving as a collective. In the spirit of

>> > diversity,

>> > inclusiveness, and collectivism our contests shall have no winners.

>> > Everyone is declared a loser, which in our

>> book means an ethical team player.

>> >

>> > _______________________________________________

>> > Gathering mailing list

>> > Gathering at misera.net

>> > http://four.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/gathering

>> >

>> >

>> >

>> > _______________________________________________

>> > Gathering mailing list

>> > Gathering at misera.net

>> > http://four.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/gathering

>> >

>>

>>

>>_______________________________________________

>>Gathering mailing list

>>Gathering at misera.net

>>http://four.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/gathering

>

> Competition is a barbaric, insensitive ritual that reeks of social Darwinism.

> We cannot allow the fittest to survive on our pages. Your loss is someone

> else's gain, and your gain is someone else's loss. Therefore, losers contribute

> to the society and winners take away from it.

> Being a winner is unethical, while

> a society of losers is happy and striving as a

> collective. In the spirit of diversity,

> inclusiveness, and collectivism our contests shall have no winners.

> Everyone is declared a loser, which in our book means an ethical team player.

> _______________________________________________

> Gathering mailing list

> Gathering at misera.net

> http://four.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/gathering

>