[kj] OT - List of books Sarah Palin wanted banned

[The Exorcist]

And don't forget the Fairness Doctrine...

Obama  "I hope Congress gets to work right away on reestablishing the 
Fairness Doctrine with the FCC. There needs
to be balance on the airwaves again on radio as well as TV and cable."

It seems Obama only believes in "Free speech" if he agrees with it. 
The hypocrisy lives on.

Compare this and my previous post Vs. a fictional list of banned books.
You tell me which is worse.

Sincerely,
Me

At 05:12 PM 9/6/2008, fluke fluke wrote:

>I dont see how you can judge a person  on the basis of when they 

>first got their passport .

>Also she didn't ban any books  whilst she was Mayor she just ............

>

>"Palin herself, questioned at the time, called her inquiries 

>rhetorical and simply part of a policy discussion with a department 

>head "about understanding and following administration agendas," 

>according to the Frontiersman article."

>

>    I abhor these Left Wing smear campaigns, they are dishonest , 

> deceitful and they distort the democratic process .

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

> > From: vassifer at earthlink.net

> > To: gathering at misera.net

> > Date: Sat, 6 Sep 2008 16:57:34 -0400

> > Subject: Re: [kj] OT - List of books Sarah Palin wanted banned

> >

> >

> > Like I said, it certainly fits her profile, though I'd be damn

> > surprised if she's even HEART of HALF of these books (woman didn't get

> > her first passport until 2007, for cryin' out loud).

> >

> > More to the point though: Regardless of title, the banning of ANY book

> > is completely fucked up.

> >

> > May she rot.

> >

> > Alex in NYC

> >

> >

> >

> > On Sep 6, 2008, at 4:22 PM, B. Oliver Sheppard wrote:

> >

> > > Wow, I know she had some deal with the library, and I hate this

> > > evil, hypocritical version of Tina Fey, but is that list accurate. I

> > > mean, LYSISTRATA? Banned?

> > >

> > > Part of me wouldn't doubt it -- but part of me insists on a

> > > snopes.com check.

> > >

> > > -Oliver

> > >

> > > LONESTYLE at aol.com wrote:

> > >> Check this one out...

> > >> ~LB

> > >>

> > >

> > > _______________________________________________

> > > Gathering mailing list

> > > Gathering at misera.net

> > > http://four.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/gathering

> >

> > _______________________________________________

> > Gathering mailing list

> > Gathering at misera.net

> > http://four.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/gathering

>

>

>

>----------

>Try Facebook in Windows Live Messenger! 

><http://clk.atdmt.com/UKM/go/111354030/direct/01/>Try it Now!

>_______________________________________________

>Gathering mailing list

>Gathering at misera.net

>http://four.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/gathering


Competition is a barbaric, insensitive ritual that reeks of social Darwinism.
We cannot allow the fittest to survive on our pages. Your loss is someone
else's gain, and your gain is someone else's loss. Therefore, losers contribute
to the society and winners take away from it. Being a winner is 
unethical, while
a society of losers is happy and striving as a collective. In the 
spirit of diversity,
inclusiveness, and collectivism our contests shall have no winners.
Everyone is declared a loser, which in our book means an ethical team player.  
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://four.pairlist.net/pipermail/gathering/attachments/20080906/fdd797d0/attachment.htm>