[kj] ot- palin vote

[Change]

Someone should attack her physically.
Or better still the cunt should go on a hunt with Dickhead Chainy.



--- On Wed, 8/10/08, Alexander Smith <vassifer at earthlink.net> wrote:


> From: Alexander Smith <vassifer at earthlink.net>

> Subject: Re: [kj] ot- palin vote

> To: "A list about all things Killing Joke (the band!)" <gathering at misera.net>

> Date: Wednesday, 8 October, 2008, 12:12 PM

> "She's been the most vilified and attacked person

> in ages."

> 

> Hardly. If anything, she hasn't been attacked ENOUGH.

> Not about her  

> gender or her character, but ABOUT HER RECORD.

> 

> She's shit.

> 

> Alex in NYC

> 

> 

> On Oct 8, 2008, at 3:18 AM, The Exorcist wrote:

> 

> > Soft on her? She's been the most vilified and

> attacked person in ages.

> >

> > The Bush Doctrine? What about Joe Biden's massive

> screwup  

> > interpreting the constitution? (Wait a second! for

> someone who

> > has been in the field for 35 years... screws up so

> bad... Yet no one  

> > says a word? AMAZING! This is the friggin

> CONSTITUTION!

> > But I've heard nary a peep.)

> >

> > As I've pointed out before, the interviewer (Mr.

> Gibson) himself did  

> > not know the Bush doctrine and

> > was immediately smacked down by the individual who

> coined the phrase  

> > (Charles Krauthammer).

> > I've linked to it in my previous emails when we

> had the whole Palin  

> > thing going on.

> >

> http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/09/12/AR2008091202457.html

> >

> > You may disagree all you want Brendan but you are dead

> wrong on this.

> > Not to mention that even if you were correct, not

> knowing the  

> > constitution (after being in the service for 35 years)

> > or not knowing the bush doctrine - you tell me which

> is more pathetic.

> >

> > (And I still stand by my opinion that Obama is a

> talentless hack who  

> > never accomplished anything and was hand-held

> > his entire career. Go and read up on how he achieved

> every job title  

> > he ever had.)

> >

> > Judge not lest ye be judged. :)

> >

> > Cheers,

> > Yos

> >

> >

> > At 12:07 AM 10/8/2008, Brendan wrote:

> >> "Given enough time she'd be just as good

> with talking points and  

> >> gotcha's

> >> as he is."

> >>

> >> That's an assumption I disagree with...unlike

> some others who have  

> >> gone

> >> soft on her, I think stuff like not knowing what

> the Bush Doctrine  

> >> is is

> >> absolutely pathetic, and provides more evidence

> that she's in there  

> >> for

> >> reasons of personality / looks / gender /

> demographic as opposed to  

> >> talent

> >> (gasp!).

> >>

> >> > Every poll is rigged... Look at the Daily

> Kos; they list every poll

> >> > out there and tell everyone to go and vote to

> change the numbers.

> >> > They do this for Obama, Palin, Mccain and

> every other friggin  

> >> person out

> >> > there.

> >> >

> >> > Look up freep and words similar to that.

> >> >

> >> > You ppl. really need to stop getting so

> fussy. :)

> >> >

> >> > When the Obama sent out the mass mailer to

> all their supporters to

> >> > shut down the radio show

> >> > that hosted some of his detractors I

> don't recall you worrying much

> >> > about bias. :)

> >> >

> >> > BTW, IMHO, her qualifications are just as

> good as Obama (which  

> >> means

> >> > ZERO or close to it). He just has his

> >> > talking points down better after campaigning

> for so long. Given

> >> > enough time she'd be just as good with

> talking

> >> > points and gotcha's as he is.

> >> >

> >> > Obama is currently in the lead and may very

> well win the election.

> >> > Life goes on and you prepare for the next

> one.

> >> >

> >> > BTW.... The same thing that those nasty

> "republicans" are  

> >> doing... is

> >> > the same thing you are doing now.

> >> >

> >> > Cheers,

> >> > Me :)

> >> >

> >> >

> >> > At 11:12 AM 10/7/2008, fluw wrote:

> >> >>Forward--

> >> >>

> >> >>PBS has an online poll posted asking if

> Sarah Palin is

> >> >>qualified.  Apparently the Republicans

> knew about this in advance

> >> >>and are flooding the voting with YES

> votes.  I know -- it's only a

> >> >>poll.  But it will be reported on PBS,

> picked up by mainstream  

> >> media

> >> >>and can influence undecided voters in

> swing states. Please do two

> >> >>things -- takes 20 seconds

> >> >>1)  Click on link and vote yourself. 

> Here's the link:

> >> >>

> >> >><

> http://www.pbs.org/now/polls/poll-435.html >

> http://www.pbs.org/now/polls/poll-435.html

> >> >>2)  Then send this to every single voter

> you know, irregardless of

> >> >>party affiliation, and  urge them to vote

> and pass it on.

> >> >>The last thing we need is PBS having to

> say their viewers think

> >> >>Sarah Palin is qualified unless we ALL

> vote.

> >> >>Thanks.

> >> >>

> >>

> >>_______________________________________________

> >> >>Gathering mailing list

> >> >>Gathering at misera.net

> >> >>

> http://four.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/gathering

> >> >

> >> > Competition is a barbaric, insensitive ritual

> that reeks of social

> >> > Darwinism.

> >> > We cannot allow the fittest to survive on our

> pages. Your loss is  

> >> someone

> >> > else's gain, and your gain is someone

> else's loss. Therefore,  

> >> losers

> >> > contribute

> >> > to the society and winners take away from it.

> Being a winner is

> >> > unethical, while

> >> > a society of losers is happy and striving as

> a collective. In the

> >> > spirit of diversity,

> >> > inclusiveness, and collectivism our contests

> shall have no winners.

> >> > Everyone is declared a loser, which in our

> book means an ethical  

> >> team

> >> > player.

> >> >

> _______________________________________________

> >> > Gathering mailing list

> >> > Gathering at misera.net

> >> >

> http://four.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/gathering

> >> >

> >>

> >>

> >> _______________________________________________

> >> Gathering mailing list

> >> Gathering at misera.net

> >>

> http://four.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/gathering

> >

> > Competition is a barbaric, insensitive ritual that

> reeks of social  

> > Darwinism.

> > We cannot allow the fittest to survive on our pages.

> Your loss is  

> > someone

> > else's gain, and your gain is someone else's

> loss. Therefore, losers  

> > contribute

> > to the society and winners take away from it. Being a

> winner is  

> > unethical, while

> > a society of losers is happy and striving as a

> collective. In the  

> > spirit of diversity,

> > inclusiveness, and collectivism our contests shall

> have no winners.

> > Everyone is declared a loser, which in our book means

> an ethical  

> > team player.

> >

> > _______________________________________________

> > Gathering mailing list

> > Gathering at misera.net

> > http://four.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/gathering

> 

> _______________________________________________

> Gathering mailing list

> Gathering at misera.net

> http://four.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/gathering