[kj] ot- palin vote

[The Exorcist]

Every poll is rigged... Look at the Daily Kos; they list every poll 
out there and tell everyone to go and vote to change the numbers.
They do this for Obama, Palin, Mccain and every other friggin person out there.

Look up freep and words similar to that.

You ppl. really need to stop getting so fussy. :)

When the Obama sent out the mass mailer to all their supporters to 
shut down the radio show
that hosted some of his detractors I don't recall you worrying much 
about bias. :)

BTW, IMHO, her qualifications are just as good as Obama (which means 
ZERO or close to it). He just has his
talking points down better after campaigning for so long. Given 
enough time she'd be just as good with talking
points and gotcha's as he is.

Obama is currently in the lead and may very well win the election. 
Life goes on and you prepare for the next one.

BTW.... The same thing that those nasty "republicans" are doing... is 
the same thing you are doing now.

Cheers,
Me :)


At 11:12 AM 10/7/2008, fluw wrote:

>Forward--

>

>PBS has an online poll posted asking if Sarah Palin is 

>qualified.  Apparently the Republicans knew about this in advance 

>and are flooding the voting with YES votes.  I know -- it's only a 

>poll.  But it will be reported on PBS, picked up by mainstream media 

>and can influence undecided voters in swing states. Please do two 

>things -- takes 20 seconds

>1)  Click on link and vote yourself.  Here's the link:

> 

><http://www.pbs.org/now/polls/poll-435.html>http://www.pbs.org/now/polls/poll-435.html

>2)  Then send this to every single voter you know, irregardless of 

>party affiliation, and  urge them to vote and pass it on.

>The last thing we need is PBS having to say their viewers think 

>Sarah Palin is qualified unless we ALL vote.

>Thanks.

>

>_______________________________________________

>Gathering mailing list

>Gathering at misera.net

>http://four.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/gathering


Competition is a barbaric, insensitive ritual that reeks of social Darwinism.
We cannot allow the fittest to survive on our pages. Your loss is someone
else's gain, and your gain is someone else's loss. Therefore, losers contribute
to the society and winners take away from it. Being a winner is 
unethical, while
a society of losers is happy and striving as a collective. In the 
spirit of diversity,
inclusiveness, and collectivism our contests shall have no winners.
Everyone is declared a loser, which in our book means an ethical team player.  
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://four.pairlist.net/pipermail/gathering/attachments/20081007/2b12365a/attachment.html>