[kj] Jaz

[The Exorcist]

Well, can't we have constructive criticism? :)

However, I think we can criticize an individuals behaviors while 
appreciating his/her talent.
One does not negate the other.

At 07:49 PM 6/24/2008, jo wrote:

>

>

>I'd find it hard to disagree with that, but I still think there's 

>more to it than that, I just can't put it into words yet.

>

>Here's a rough attempt: since his ego has grown so large, many 

>peoples' respect has shrunk.

>:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::

>

>Do better then!

>

>As an artist at least he's got the guts to push forward his thoughts 

>and expressions; for want of a better term.  Continiously.

>

>Let's not forget Geordie, his brother,  who's rocked symbiotically 

>too many times over the years.

>

>If you want the best of them you're part of it rather than being a 

>lead weight critic.

>

>Ego can be a defensive thing.

>

>

>

>

>_______________________________________________

>Gathering mailing list

>Gathering at misera.net

>http://four.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/gathering


Competition is a barbaric, insensitive ritual that reeks of social Darwinism.
We cannot allow the fittest to survive on our pages. Your loss is someone
else's gain, and your gain is someone else's loss. Therefore, losers contribute
to the society and winners take away from it. Being a winner is 
unethical, while
a society of losers is happy and striving as a collective. In the 
spirit of diversity,
inclusiveness, and collectivism our contests shall have no winners.
Everyone is declared a loser, which in our book means an ethical team player.  
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://four.pairlist.net/pipermail/gathering/attachments/20080624/aeaba62a/attachment.html>