[kj] OT: Maxim .........

fluke fluke fluke1 at live.co.uk
Tue Feb 26 16:40:32 EST 2008




I personally do not care what some fuckwit journo thunks . Taste in music is subjective and just because he doesn't like it , that doesn't tmean to say that I wont like it .
Do you think its possible that the whole thing could have been orchestrated by the band? A good marketing ploy to get free publicity? Give the magazines just one song to review and when they review it, make a big fuss about the reviewer not hearing the complete album.........all that free publicity..........you sucker


> Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2008 15:14:18 -0600> From: bigblackhair at sbcglobal.net> To: gathering at misera.net> Subject: Re: [kj] OT: Maxim magazine apologizes for negative review of LP it hadn't listened to> > The entire LP was given a rating of two stars and it hadn't been heard.> > Maybe it's okay for you to read reviews of, say, movies, based on a > critic having watched only 2 minutes of it, but most people wouldn't > trust such critics, even if you, black sheep that you are, wouldn't give > a shit.> > -Oliver> > > fluke fluke wrote:> > > > > > So what . Big deal.......like Who cares?> > He reviewed what he heard, what more can you ask for ?> >> >> >> > _______________________________________________> Gathering mailing list> Gathering at misera.net> http://four.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/gathering

_________________________________________________________________
Get Hotmail on your mobile, text MSN to 63463!
http://mobile.uk.msn.com/pc/mail.aspx
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://four.pairlist.net/pipermail/gathering/attachments/20080226/4216486b/attachment.htm>


More information about the Gathering mailing list