[kj] ot. new bauhaus C.D, ;( what a let down! NO

[pascal]

Go away…white or black, it’s off my turntable…very mediocre

 

   _____  

From: gathering-bounces at misera.net [mailto:gathering-bounces at misera.net] On
Behalf Of sade1
Sent: 17 April 2008 22:09
To: A list about all things Killing Joke (the band!)
Subject: Re: [kj] ot. new bauhaus C.D, ;( what a let down! NO

 

I haven't heard the new Bauhaus yet, but will do soon. 



GREG SLAWSON <gregslawson at msn.com> wrote:

Yes, but  Gang of Four have songs, with simple yet hummable melodies (except
"Anthrax"), and even though the guitar is jagged, there are still melody
lines and riffs. The new Bauhaus, esp., just sounded like parts of songs
that weren't even finished.


   _____  


Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2008 20:48:28 -0700
From: saulomar1 at yahoo.com
To: gathering at misera.net
Subject: Re: [kj] ot. new bauhaus C.D, ;( what a let down! NO

   Bauhaus for me is an experience, more than just the music (which i regard


as summa tha best stuff I've ever heard). 

   Personally that revolves alot around their live presence and performance
of their 

work, because it's the only way 

I got to know'em,right from the start: 

 
-gig-concert-concert-gig-concert-etc.etc. 3 gigs in '98, 

                                                    -3 gigs in '05. Peter
twice, L&R their farewell gig at the

                                                    -Roxy in '96 (didn't
knowthey were Bauhaus-sans-Peter.

 

   But i get your comment too. I absolutely loved Gang Of Four when I saw
them 

live (IMO the most moving live performances I've ever seen) BUT . . . I buy
their cds, 

I'll put'em on = and they sound like total shit on disc. 

  Woulnd't and haven't played those discs since i first bought them - but if
they announce

a tour, i'm there in a hummingbird's heartbeat.  Weird, i know.

 

GREG SLAWSON <gregslawson at msn.com> wrote:

Havent' heard much Bauhuas beyond their college (US) radio "hits", but I
don't "get" them. SOund like David Bowie singing non-songs, just lame
slightly dirgy limping rants (not nearly as good as "It's a Dreeeeegs" by
the Joke)...


   _____  


Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2008 18:34:52 -0700
From: saulomar1 at yahoo.com
To: gathering at misera.net
Subject: Re: [kj] ot. new bauhaus C.D, ;( what a let down! NO


> I call it the Edgar Allan Poe meets a Glam undertaker look........ 


 

Whenever i looked up at Peter's bleach-blond cone-shaped hair HYPERLINK
"http://www.flickr.com/photos/prudenceneverpays/360234801/" \non his last
solo tour 

i kept thinking, "HYPERLINK
"http://www.ear.fm/Encyclopedia%20D/dr_and_the_medics.jpg" \nDoctor." 

 


> anyone looks better next to Trent Reznor...


 

And will sound better, too. Or better put, he'll sound horrendous singing
next 

to anyone else. 

 

Case in point:

  for Halloween '96 I went to see NIN opening for David Bowie. The last song
NIN played 

was "Hurt," and at song's end the stage and venue went pitch-black as Trent
Reznor held

 ("held") the last note in the dark. Soon the most impressive Voice chimed
in imultaneously

and sings that same note, and Reznor sounded absolutely, embarrasingly,
oh-god-no-please HORRID. 

  Me and my friend looked at each other and agreed no way would we have
publicly 

embarrased ourselves like that by sharing that note with Bowie's
oh-so-flawless tone-&-

sustain. We actually felt sorry for Trent, and not in any patronizing manner
but, didn't he

know Bowie is 3 light-years beyond him, we wondered.  I mean, we felt it
when Bowie chimed in on that same note. He sounds stellar.

 

  ...so the lights went up, all NIN gear was gone and Bowie's band was in
place, rocking.

They closed with "Under Pressure."

 

Bauhaus asides...

--- Doesn't the Gotham album cover look somewhat genitalic, even from any
angle? 

Noticedit when i first got it: HYPERLINK
"http://thesentinelsoftime.club.fr/Images/Bauhaus%20Gotham.jpg"
\nhttp://thesentinelsoftime.club.fr/Images/Bauhaus%20Gotham.jpg

 

--- A million dollars to whoever can explain to me the significance 

    of the Head in the Lightbox effect Peter uses during "Double Dare":

    HYPERLINK "http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5z9djjD2XnM&feature=related"
\nhttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5z9djjD2XnM&feature=related 

                       (Baphomet is the closest i can get to explaining it)

 

--- And the rehearsal for that box effect: HYPERLINK
"http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OEsJh4hHWEc"
\nhttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OEsJh4hHWEc

 


Bette Dillinger <bettedillinger at live.com> wrote:

"When I saw them in '05, that was also a damn good show but they basically 
did their show on a bare stage with no props unlike the '98 tour and Murphy 
frankly looked like he'd aged about 20 years, looked really unkempt with a 
pot belly and badly bleached scraggly hair complete with a big bald patch."
 
I call it the Edgar Allan Poe meets a Glam undertaker look........ I read he
was very angry at the rest of the band, and felt his looks were being
focused on to the exclusion of everything else (yeah, wah wah wah, Murphy).
But, I mean, he didn't look that horrific.  He even did a runway
thing.....look up a video under "Peter Murphy Buckler".....he sang and
spiffed himself up more......kind of in keep with my theory that he
distorted his looks so much to upset the other members of the band.
Whatever.  No one is 25 forever.
  
"He looked somewhat better when I saw them open for Nine Inch Nails a year 
later but his best days are clearly behind him and he looks like a right 
twat when he does those goofy goth aerobics moves these days."
 
Goth moves?  All he did when I saw him was swing his jacket.....but then,
that band fell apart during this last tour so he could have been hopping
around like in the beginning of "the Hunger" for all I know on the first
leg.
 
IMO anyone looks better next to Trent Reznor in 2008..;0  They should make a
cardboard cutout of him for insecure peeps.......
 
-Bette
 
 
 
rom: Partyslammer at socal.rr.com

> To: gathering at misera.net

> Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2008 15:05:18 -0700

> Subject: Re: [kj] ot. new bauhaus C.D, ;( what a let down! NO

> 

> ----- Original Message ----- 

> From: "sade1" wrote:

> 

> 

> >> these types of reunions reek of desperation for acceptance and cash.

> >

> > Not Bauhaus'. Both the '98 and '05 tours prolly scared the shit out of 

> > wannabe

> > bands into quitting music and go back to school. I want to think it also



> > halved the

> > lifespan of the Emo genre:

> > how could one see Bauhaus live and dare to spin emo from the same 6 

> > strings.

> > Sacrilege, heathens...blasphemies! *evil Jaz eyeglare*

> 

> I kind of missed the boat when Bauhaus was first around at the beginning

of 

> the 80's. Beyond picking up their two compilation cds "1979 - 1983" and 

> liking a few of their more significant singles, I really didn't listen to

or 

> know much else about them. I actually got more into Love and Rockets

through 

> the 80's due to their self titled album with the single "So Alive."

> 

> However, when Bauhaus reformed in '98, I saw one of their Hollywood 

> Palladium shows on basically a whim and it turned out to be one of the all



> time best concerts I've ever seen and I quickly went nuts and bought 

> everything they've ever released on any format.

> 

> When I saw them in '05, that was also a damn good show but they basically 

> did their show on a bare stage with no props unlike the '98 tour and

Murphy 

> frankly looked like he'd aged about 20 years, looked really unkempt with a



> pot belly and badly bleached scraggly hair complete with a big bald patch.



> He looked somewhat better when I saw them open for Nine Inch Nails a year 

> later but his best days are clearly behind him and he looks like a right 

> twat when he does those goofy goth aerobics moves these days.


 

... ... ... ... ... ... 
(looking at the current state of things)


'Save me..                                                

 save me from Tomorrow..                          
 I don't want to sail in this Ship Of Fools...!'   

  

   _____  

Be a better friend, newshound, and know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile. HYPERLINK
"http://us.rd.yahoo.com/evt=51733/*http:/mobile.yahoo.com/;_ylt=Ahu06i62sR8H
DtDypao8Wcj9tAcJ%20"Try it now.

No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG.
Version: 7.5.524 / Virus Database: 269.23.0/1383 - Release Date: 17/04/2008
09:00


No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG. 
Version: 7.5.524 / Virus Database: 269.23.0/1383 - Release Date: 17/04/2008
09:00
 
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://four.pairlist.net/pipermail/gathering/attachments/20080417/129a6ba7/attachment-0001.htm>