[kj] back to oil!!!

[Mister Black]

It wasnt just about oil , although that may have been a factor . Saddam was happy to keep producing and selling oil , and the attack on Iraq will cost more than it would have cost to simply buy the oil .
  Even if the attack on Iraq was solely to do with oil, is this such a bad thing . Would people be willing to pay a lot more for their fuel? If so, then why were there recent mass protests when the price of  gasoline increased . If Iraq switched off their oil pumps, then the cost of oil would surge , causing a huge rise in everything , and this would bring a World recession .
  Would you rather have a World recession or the removal of an evil dictator............ coz thats what it boils down to.



========================================
Message Received: Jul 20 2007, 06:28 PM
From: "uncle benny's magical bra & liquorice factory" 
To: "The Gathering" 
Cc: 
Subject: Re: [kj] back to woik!!!

On 20/7/07 18:21, "GREG SLAWSON" wrote:


the fact that they invaded Iraq and got rid of former ally Saddam has made the world safe for democracy!


... the fact that Iraq is sat on the worlds 2nd largest oil reserves didn’t feature at all.
Demockery indeed.
Great bit of grafitti on a bridge in Manchester’s Moss Side at the time of ‘Gulf War 1’
“If Kuwait grew carrots...?” 
[ (no name for attachment) (0.1 Kb) ]
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://four.pairlist.net/pipermail/gathering/attachments/20070720/32e81045/attachment.html>