[kj] Hated footy players past n present & threats

FLIGHT BRINGER flightbringer at hotmail.co.uk
Tue Mar 28 08:19:20 EST 2006


Yes, but even if a rogue supporter did send a death threat, then the club 
should nt be held accountable or responsible. The Club has no way of 
controlling people who claim to be supporters. The only action the club can 
take is to ban them, and if they dont go or arent members, then the club are 
powerless.
   The Club confiscated someones season ticket for standing up last week and 
someone was also in court for swearing at a game. The Club will use all its 
powers to bring people into line, but if someone not affiliated with the 
club and sends threats anonymously, then the Club are powerless to act and 
therefore cannot be held responsible.
   The Club asked to see the threats so they could trace them and prosecute, 
but the so-called threats were never shown. The only reasonable theory is 
that they never existed in the first place. Why did nt Frisk want the 
senders traced? How come no one else saw them? Its only his word that you 
are going on . Why do you believe him  when he cant back up his claims?
Surely circumstantial evidence is not in his favor.

P.S I'll add  the "nt" myself, I'll give you the benefit of the doubt :-)

   "but just to make it clear i'm saying you are paranoid"

>From: bluce ree <bluceree2003 at yahoo.co.uk>
>Reply-To: "A list about all things Killing Joke (the 
>band!)"<gathering at misera.net>
>To: "A list about all things Killing Joke (the band!)" 
><gathering at misera.net>
>Subject: Re: [kj] Hated footy players past n present & threats
>Date: Tue, 28 Mar 2006 13:49:13 +0100 (BST)
>
>you've backed up your claims plenty but none of it
>makes much sense.  most of it sounds pretty thin to be
>honest.  anyone who knows about Chelsea knows that
>they have a properly mad element (even if they cant
>afford to go anymore).  need i mention Ken Bates'
>electric fence idea from the 80s?  so there are
>definately fans capable of death threats.
>
>but just to make it clear i'm saying you are paranoid
>(as in labelling you as a paranoid person) or
>anything, just that these particular arguments are
>paranoid.
>
>if that makes sense.  ie - this isnt personal!
>
>either way, let us know if any concrete findings
>emerge!
>
>

_________________________________________________________________
Are you using the latest version of MSN Messenger? Download MSN Messenger 
7.5 today! http://join.msn.com/messenger/overview



More information about the Gathering mailing list