On 22/3/06 13:53, "Paul Rangecroft" wrote: > at least KJ know what year it is. (i think) Perhaps they don¹t & that¹s what problem is - everyone thought it was 2005 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://four.pairlist.net/pipermail/gathering/attachments/20060322/542e2a3e/attachment.htm