[kj] Re: Weird places

[FLIGHT BRINGER]

" disclose why the house is being sold in light of murders"

   As long as the murderer was nt still hiding in one of the cupboards , 
then I dont see any reason why anyone would be dissuaded from buying a place 
in which someone had been killed.
What difference does it make what happened in the past? What happened in the 
past will have no effect on the present.
    We ve all got to die somewhere.




>From: "Christof hamille" <wessidetempest at hotmail.com>
>Reply-To: "A list about all things Killing Joke (the band!)" 
><gathering at misera.net>
>To: gathering at misera.net
>Subject: Re: [kj] Re: Weird places
>Date: Wed, 08 Mar 2006 12:32:58 -0500
>
>>From my understanding California has a specific law about real estate that
>requires the realtor/seller to disclose why the house is being sold in 
>light of murders or deaths (natural causes).  Other states have this law 
>also.  Now maybe the loop hole is if you are the second or third owner 
>after the deceased you then do not have to reveal that info.  Maybe.  Is 
>there a lawyer in the house?
>
>Chris
>

_________________________________________________________________
Are you using the latest version of MSN Messenger? Download MSN Messenger 
7.5 today! http://messenger.msn.co.uk