[kj] gems

[Mark Kolmar]

I can absorb the loss -- I already don't have the money on hand -- or
else I wouldn't have fronted the money.  Still, fronting money is a
sacred trust.  The amount is unimportant.  It's the principle of the
thing.  I invested a small amount in the project, and require a status
update.  They owe the merchandise, a refund, or an explanation.

--Mark

On 12/14/06, Phillipps Marc <Marc.Phillipps at enfield.nhs.uk> wrote:


> I doubt the legal position is any worse than taking money for goods and then

> not supplying said goods . .

>

> We should write to Watchdog :o)

>

>

> Marc.

>

>

>

> -----Original Message-----

> From: Rob's Arse [mailto:joker at Z6.com]

> Sent: 13 December 2006 17:27

> To: gathering at misera.net

> Subject: [kj] gems

>

>

>

> What would the situation be if someone had access to a copy of Gems and had

> paid for the official release but never received anything??

>

> If these copies were lent to other people, would that be illegal if they

> were lent and no money changed hands?

>

> I don't know the legal situation. Seriously, if there is someone with the

> definitive word out there I would be interested in hearing about it/

>

> Say this scenario were to potentially happen, do you think that this might

> galvanize those behind the project to actually do what is right and either

> send people their stuff or refund the money.

>

> God forbid that an angry mob should strip the merch stall next time killing

> joke played anywhere....

>

> Just a thought you understand.......

>

> i wonder if Mat still gets these mails??