[kj] This is how I rate KJs albums

[Jpwhkj at aol.com]

I think both serve as conversation-starters, and can be interesting taken as a whole (i.e. the group response) but otherwise...

Alexander Smith <vassifer at earthlink.net> writes:

>Polls are more interesting that simply lists, I'll have you know.
>
>Alex in NYC
>
>
>On Sunday, October 30, 2005, at 03:44 PM, Jpwhkj at aol.com wrote:
>
>> Speaketh the poll-meister!
>>
>> Actually, I found this thread quite interesting, not due to anyone's exact positioning, but because with only a few exceptions people's top 5 included the first four albums (or at least 3 of them).
>>
>> Also - some while ago (in 2003) someone was asking how everyone rated KJ2003 and would we listen to it in 6 months' time... I got the feeling from the lists that as the novelty wore off, people were less impressed with KJ2003.
>>
>> Jamie
>>
>> Alexander Smith <vassifer at earthlink.net> writes:
>>
>>> which is why I find this exercise kinda pointless. I'm not 
complaining -- we are "on topic" after all -- but lists are just kinda dull and pointless