OT RE: [kj] ot:Blair savaging UK Democracy

[Partridge, Felicity]

Eye eye!  yes, my name may reflect my parent's middle class aspirations but not my brain power!  (look at how stupid the royals are!) I wasn't having a go at TB, as I am told he is paid less than £100,000.  (no mean salary for most but not very much compared with investors etc) I wanted to put a view out there in the most general and idealistic terms and thank you for replying.

  _____  

From: gathering-bounces at misera.net [mailto:gathering-bounces at misera.net] On Behalf Of luke
Sent: 28 July 2005 14:49
To: gathering at misera.net
Subject: RE: OT RE: [kj] ot:Blair savaging UK Democracy



With a name like Felicity Partridge,I would have thought you would be a bit more knowledgeable than that.
For a start , relatively speaking Tony Blair is poorly paid for the job he does, leaders of big corporations earn at least ten times his salary, as he is leading the whole country his renumeration should be the countries largest.
To suggest that Tony Blair is doing the job just for the high!!! salary is also ludicrous, he could earn at least ten times what he is getting now if he quit as PM and toured the world making speeches, what he earns in a year now, he could earn in a week making speeches in the USA.
Tony Blair has a very important job, he also has to make important decision's, it's not in anyones interest if TB has to worry about whether he can afford to purchase a new pair of shoes whilst contemplating these decisions



--- On Thu 07/28, Partridge, Felicity < felicity.partridge at financial-ombudsman.org.uk > wrote:



	From: Partridge, Felicity [mailto: felicity.partridge at financial-ombudsman.org.uk]
	To: gathering at misera.net
	Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 11:20:34 +0100
	Subject: RE: OT RE: [kj] ot:Blair savaging UK Democracy
	
	
	Hmmmm not such a bright idea then. I would suggest paying them a low but reasonable salary but that is clearly not the answer. It's the old hackneyed problem whereby the kind of principled people who we might want to take decisions on our behalf are usually those who do not want to be public leaders, and so we are left with the second rate ones who are susceptible to bribes and corruption, etc. But if removing financial incentives doesn't work then I am as ever, stumped. (but not stunted).
	
	
  _____  

	From: gathering-bounces at misera.net [mailto:gathering-bounces at misera.net] On Behalf Of Jester
	Sent: 26 July 2005 21:23
	To: A list about all things Killing Joke (the band!)
	Subject: Re: OT RE: [kj] ot:Blair savaging UK Democracy
	
	
	
	
	
	

	On Jul 26, 2005, at 11:22 AM, Partridge, Felicity wrote: 


	

	Yes I'd go along with that insofar it would be an improvement. Ideally, leaders should be paid very little and not allowed any privileges to eliminate greedy types who will do the job for the money rather than for the benefit of the country. 


	Well, that is already in practice to some degree, as far as government salary. A small level of government is run that way...a lot of towns and cities pay the mayor VERY little. You know who becomes the mayor? The very wealthy, because no one could afford to live on that salary. 


	~ Jester 


	

	
  _____  

	This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the system manger. 

	

	This e-mail message has been scanned for Viruses and Content and cleared by NetIQ MailMarshal 

	The recipient of this email should ensure that it is virus free. We do not accept any liability for any virus that may be conveyed with this email. 
  _____  


	

	_______________________________________________
	Gathering mailing list
	Gathering at misera.net
	http://four.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/gathering
	


  _____  

No banners. No pop-ups. No kidding.
Make My Way your home on the Web - http://www.myway.com 


#####################################################################################
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the system manger.

This e-mail message has been scanned for Viruses and Content and cleared by NetIQ MailMarshal 

The recipient of this email should ensure that it is virus free. We do not accept any liability for any virus that may be conveyed with this email.

#####################################################################################
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://four.pairlist.net/pipermail/gathering/attachments/20050728/d188ccbd/attachment-0001.html