[kj] 1977 and all that

gathering@misera.net gathering@misera.net
Mon, 29 Mar 2004 17:22:45 EST


-------------------------------1080598965
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

In a message dated 3/29/2004 3:44:15 PM Eastern Standard Time, 
peter.west410@ntlworld.com writes:
punk
band.If it's about the music then I m sure you can go back in time to the
50s ,there must of been some awful rock band which could be classified as
punk.So its not about the music.It's not about the clothes either, anyone
wouldnt call him quite punk, but you got to think about Link Ray

-------------------------------1080598965
Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<HTML><HEAD>
<META charset=3DUS-ASCII http-equiv=3DContent-Type content=3D"text/html; cha=
rset=3DUS-ASCII">
<META content=3D"MSHTML 6.00.2800.1276" name=3DGENERATOR></HEAD>
<BODY style=3D"FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: Arial; BACKGROUND-COLOR: #fffff=
f">
<DIV>
<DIV>In a message dated 3/29/2004 3:44:15 PM Eastern Standard Time, peter.we=
st410@ntlworld.com writes:</DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE style=3D"PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: blue=20=
2px solid"><FONT face=3DArial>punk<BR>band.If it's about the music then I m=20=
sure you can go back in time to the<BR>50s ,there must of been some awful ro=
ck band which could be classified as<BR>punk.So its not about the music.It's=
 not about the clothes either, anyone</FONT></BLOCKQUOTE></DIV>
<DIV>wouldnt call him quite punk, but you got to think about Link Ray</DIV><=
/BODY></HTML>

-------------------------------1080598965--