[kj] interview

[james harper]

>>as for the implications, however phrased. i do not find it offensive to 
>>suggest a possible link between 911 and US intelligence's possible 
>>complicity.
>
>!!!!!!!!!!!!!! i don't find it offesive to _suggest_ either! didn't you 
>read my last post?! it's the way he said it that i object to. it's his smug 
>self-righteous arrogant pompous foolish reckless tactless insensitive 
>bullying egotistical sneering bigoted wanky attitude that i hate.

For myself, I'm most annoyed at the growing number of people who "know" the 
whole thing was faked/staged/plotted by the CIA/whatever and have decided 
that anyone who doesn't also "know" is an ignorant moron that is at best 
ignoring the "truth" and at worst complicit in state-sponsored mass murder. 
There's no room to judge the evidence for yourself, and there's no possible 
way you can arrive at a different conclusion.

Given that the whole matter revolves around finding the truth for yourself 
and not accepting the version someone else hands you, I find it bloody 
irritating that there's so many intolerant zealots ready to pounce every 
time someone says something different.

Jim.

--------------------------

It's always funny until someone gets hurt and then it's just hilarious...

_________________________________________________________________
The new MSN 8: advanced junk mail protection and 2 months FREE*  
http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail